Support vector machines for predicting distribution of sudden oak death in California

被引:231
作者
Guo, QH
Kelly, M
Graham, CH
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Museum Vertebrate Zool, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
geographic information systems; support vector machines; potential disease spread; sudden oak death;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.012
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In the central California coastal forests, a newly discovered virulent pathogen (Phytophthora ramorum) has killed hundreds of thousands of native oak trees. Predicting the potential distribution of the disease in California remains an urgent demand of regulators and scientists. Most methods used to map potential ranges of species (e.g. multivariate or logistic regression) require both presence and absence data, the latter of which are not always feasibly collected, and thus the methods often require the generation of 'pseudo' absence data. Other methods (e.g. BIOCLIM and DOMAIN) seek to model the presence-only data directly. In this study, we present alternative methods to conventional approaches to modeling by developing support vector machines (SVMs), which are the new generation of machine learning algorithms used to find optimal separability between classes within datasets, to predict the potential distribution of Sudden Oak Death in California. We compared the performances of two types of SVMs models: two-class SVMs with 'pseudo' absence data and one-class SVMs. Both models performed well. The one-class SVMs have a slightly better true-positive rate (0.9272 +/- 0.0460 S.D.) than the two-class SVMs (0.9105 +/- 0.0712 S.D.). However, the area predicted to be at risk for the disease using the one-class SVMs (18,441 km(2)) is much larger than that of the two-class SVMs (13,828 km(2)). Both models show that the majority of disease risk will occur in coastal areas. Compared with the results of two-class SVMs, the one-class SVMs predict a potential risk in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountain ranges; much greater risks are also found in Los Angles and Humboldt Counties. We believe the support vector machines when coupled with geographic information system (GIS) will be a useful method to deal with presence-only data in ecological analysis over a range of scales. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 90
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]  
Kelly N.M., 2002, USDA-Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-184, P799
[32]   Predictive mapping for management and conservation of seagrass beds in North Carolina [J].
Kelly, NM ;
Fonseca, M ;
Whitfield, P .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 11 (06) :437-451
[33]  
Lai C, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2364, P212
[34]   HABITAT MODELS FOR NESTING BALD EAGLES IN MAINE [J].
LIVINGSTON, SA ;
TODD, CS ;
KROHN, WB ;
OWEN, RB .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1990, 54 (04) :644-653
[35]   Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds [J].
Manel, S ;
Dias, JM ;
Buckton, ST ;
Ormerod, SJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1999, 36 (05) :734-747
[36]   One-class SVMs for document classification [J].
Manevitz, LM ;
Yousef, M .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2002, 2 (02) :139-154
[37]   Machine learning for science: State of the art and future prospects [J].
Mjolsness, E ;
DeCoste, D .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5537) :2051-+
[38]   A REGIONAL LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF FAVORABLE GRAY WOLF HABITAT IN THE NORTHERN GREAT-LAKES REGION [J].
MLADENOFF, DJ ;
SICKLEY, TA ;
HAIGHT, RG ;
WYDEVEN, AP .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (02) :279-294
[39]   Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics [J].
Moisen, GG ;
Frescino, TS .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) :209-225
[40]   Relative abundance of plant functional types in grasslands and shrublands of north America [J].
Paruelo, JM ;
Lauenroth, WK .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :1212-1224