How to improve consumers' environmental sustainability judgements of foods

被引:72
作者
Lazzarini, Gianna A. [1 ]
Visschers, Vivianne H. M. [2 ]
Siegrist, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Consumer Behav, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Appl Psychol, Often, Switzerland
关键词
food choices; environmental label; environmentally friendly food; guidelines; consumers' environmental evaluation; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CONSUMPTION; PERCEPTION; HEALTH; IMPACT; PRODUCTS; LABELS; FRIENDLINESS; BEHAVIOR; COUNTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.033
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food production and consumption account for approximately one-third of households' environmental impact. Consumers thus play a major role in the shift towards more sustainable foods and diets. An overall sustainability label or simple guidelines may enable consumers to make more environmentally friendly food choices, but whether such information-based tools improve consumers' ability to choose environmentally sustainable foods has not been empirically investigated. This study's online choice task experiment shows that eco-labels and guidelines marginally increased consumers' accuracy in selecting environmentally friendly foods. Respondents adhered, however, more to guidelines than to eco-labels and led to choices with lower environmental impact. In addition, respondents showed several misconceptions related to the environmental performance of protein products, which were resistant to both eco-labels and guidelines. These findings suggest that new, costly labels may not improve consumers' environmental judgements. Instead, addressing consumers' misconceptions and finding ways to promote environmentally sustainable food purchases is essential. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Aiking H., 2006, Sustainable Protein Production and Consumption: Pigs or Peas? ISBN: 1-4020-4062-8, Series: Environment Policy, V45, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-4842-4
  • [2] Aiking H, 2006, ENVIRON POLICY, V46, P171
  • [3] [Anonymous], BUILDING THE SINGLE
  • [4] [Anonymous], FREQ ASK QUEST
  • [5] [Anonymous], NATUR K BAS SWITZ
  • [6] [Anonymous], BEV STRUKT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, Livestock long shadowEnvironmental Issues and Options, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[4:D]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Bajzelj B, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P924, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2353, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2353]
  • [10] Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study
    Borgmeier, Ingrid
    Westenhoefer, Joachim
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9