Frequency component mixing of pulsed or multi-frequency eddy current testing for nonferromagnetic plate thickness measurement using a multi-gene genetic programming algorithm

被引:20
作者
Ge, Jiuhao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yusa, Noritaka [3 ]
Fan, Mengbao [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Key Lab Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Nondestruct Detect & Monitoring Technol High Spee, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Aoba Ku, 6-6-01-2 Aramaki Aza Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Quantum Sci & Energy Engn, Aoba Ku, 6-6-01-2 Aramaki Aza Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan
[4] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mechatron Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Eddy current testing; Gini coefficient; Linearity; Genetic programming; CURRENT INSPECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102423
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
For the efficient use of frequency components, a frequency mixed feature for pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) or multi-frequency eddy current testing (MultiECT) was proposed for nonferromagnetic plate thickness measurement. An evolutionary algorithm multigene genetic programming was employed to mix the frequency components using the best linearity as a target. Time domain and frequency domain finite element simulations of PECT and MultiECT were conducted. The simulation results revealed that, in terms of thickness measurement, a mixed feature comprising two or three frequencies was more linear and accurate than the traditional peak time and decay coefficient of PECT. Experiments were conducted to validate the results of the simulations and to test the mixed feature in aluminum plate thickness evaluations. The experimental results also revealed that the use of more frequencies did not always increase the accuracy of thickness evaluations. Proper frequency component selection was more efficient than blindly increasing frequency numbers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Principal Component Analysis of Pulsed Eddy Current Response from Corrosion in Mild Steel [J].
Alamin, Mohammed ;
Tian, Gui Yun ;
Andrews, Adrian ;
Jackson, Paul .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (08) :2548-2553
[2]   Pulsed eddy-current response to a conducting half-space [J].
Bowler, J ;
Johnson, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1997, 33 (03) :2258-2264
[3]  
BOWLER JR, 1990, REV PROG Q, V9, P287
[4]  
Burke SK, 1998, REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 17A AND 17B, P307
[5]   Pulsed Eddy Current Testing of Carbon Steel Pipes' Wall-thinning Through Insulation and Cladding [J].
Cheng, Weiying .
JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2012, 31 (03) :215-224
[6]   FORMULA FOR THE GINI COEFFICIENT [J].
DORFMAN, R .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1979, 61 (01) :146-149
[7]   Thickness measurement using liftoff point of intersection in pulsed eddy current responses for elimination of liftoff effect [J].
Fan, Mengbao ;
Cao, Binghua ;
Tian, Guiyun ;
Ye, Bo ;
Li, Wei .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2016, 251 :66-74
[8]   Analytical modeling for transient probe response in pulsed eddy current testing [J].
Fan, Mengbao ;
Huang, Pingjie ;
Ye, Bo ;
Hou, Dibo ;
Zhang, Guangxin ;
Zhou, Zekui .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 42 (05) :376-383
[9]   A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to non-linear system modeling. Part II: geotechnical and earthquake engineering problems [J].
Gandomi, Amir Hossein ;
Alavi, Amir Hossein .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2012, 21 (01) :189-201
[10]   Dual frequency fusion for defect signal enhancement in EC-GMR inspecton of riveted multilayer structures [J].
Karpenko, Oleksii ;
Ye, Chaofeng ;
Udpa, Lalita .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 92 :97-103