Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD

被引:30
作者
Frazier, Rebecca [2 ]
Levine, Sarah [3 ]
Porteny, Thalia [8 ]
Tighiouart, Hocine [4 ,5 ]
Wong, John B. [7 ]
Isakova, Tamara
Koch-Weser, Susan [6 ]
Gordon, Elisa J. [1 ]
Weiner, Daniel E. [3 ]
Ladin, Keren [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Hlth Serv & Outcomes Res, Ctr Bioeth & Med Human, Div Transplanta,Dept Surg,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Jesse Brown Vet Adm Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] William B Schwartz MD Div Nephrol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Medford, MA USA
[6] Tufts Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Tufts Univ, Div Clin Decis Making, Tufts Med Ctr, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Tufts Univ, Res Ethics Aging & Community Hlth REACH Lab, Medford, MA USA
[9] Tufts Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Medford, MA USA
[10] Tufts Univ, Dept Community Hlth, Medford, MA USA
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; DIALYSIS INITIATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; RENAL DIALYSIS; START DIALYSIS; CARE; OUTCOMES; HEMODIALYSIS;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Rationale & Objective: Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about dialysis initiation. Although shared decision making (SDM) can help align patient preferences and values with treatment options, the extent to which older patients with CKD experience SDM remains unknown. Study Design: A cross-sectional analysis of patient surveys examining decisional readiness, treatment options education, care partner support, and SDM. Setting & Participants: Adults aged 70 years or older from Boston, Chicago, San Diego, or Portland (Maine) with nondialysis advanced CKD. Predictors: Decisional readiness factors, treatment options education, and care partner support. Outcomes: Primary: SDM measured by the 9item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) instrument, with higher scores reflecting greater SDM. Exploratory: Factors associated with SDM. Analytical Approach: We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the associ- ations between SDM and predictors, controlling for demographic and health factors. Results: Among 350 participants, mean age was 78 +/- 6 years, 58% were male, 13% identified as Black, and 48% had diabetes. Mean SDM-Q-9 score was 52 +/- 28. SDM item agreement ranged from 41% of participants agreeing that "my doctor and I selected a treatment option together" to 73% agreeing that "my doctor told me that there are different options for treating my medical condition." In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes, being "well informed" and "very well informed" about kidney treatment options, having higher decisional certainty, and attendance at a kidney treatment options class were independently associated with higher SDM-Q-9 scores. Limitations: The cross-sectional study design limits the ability to make temporal associations between SDM and the predictors. Conclusions: Many older patients with CKD do not experience SDM when making dialysis decisions, emphasizing the need for greater access to and delivery of education for individuals with advanced CKD.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 609
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Effectiveness of an Intervention Supporting Shared Decision Making for Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device The DECIDE-LVAD Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Allen, Larry A. ;
McIlvennan, Colleen K. ;
Thompson, Jocelyn S. ;
Dunlay, Shannon M. ;
LaRue, Shane J. ;
Lewis, Eldrin F. ;
Patel, Chetan B. ;
Blue, Laura ;
Fairclough, Diane L. ;
Leister, Erin C. ;
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Cleveland, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Phillips, Clifford ;
Baldridge, Vicie ;
Walsh, Mary Norine ;
Matlock, Daniel D. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (04) :520-529
[2]   Psychometrics of Shared Decision Making and Communication as Patient Centered Measures for Two Language Groups [J].
Alvarez, Kiara ;
Wang, Ye ;
Alegria, Margarita ;
Ault-Brutus, Andrea ;
Ramanayake, Natasha ;
Yeh, Yi-Hui ;
Jeffries, Julia R. ;
Shrout, Patrick E. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 28 (09) :1074-1086
[3]   A working partnership: A review of shared decision-making in nephrology [J].
Amir, Noa ;
McCarthy, Hugh J. ;
Tong, Allison .
NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 26 (11) :851-857
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Am J Kidney Dis, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.002
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SHARED DECISION MAKI
[6]   Renal dialysis abatement: lessons from a social study [J].
Ashby, M ;
Hoog, CO ;
Kellehear, A ;
Kerr, PG ;
Brooks, D ;
Nicholls, K ;
Forrest, M .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (05) :389-396
[7]   Avoiding Health Information [J].
Barbour, Joshua B. ;
Rintamaki, Lance S. ;
Ramsey, Jason A. ;
Brashers, Dale E. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 (02) :212-229
[8]  
Berkhout-Byrne N, 2017, NETH J MED, V75, P225
[9]  
Cassidy Brendan P, 2018, Can J Kidney Health Dis, V5, p2054358118803322, DOI 10.1177/2054358118803322
[10]  
Cassidy Brendan P, 2018, Can J Kidney Health Dis, V5, p2054358118803323, DOI 10.1177/2054358118803323