Development and validation of the Pectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life (PeCBI-QOL) questionnaire

被引:8
|
作者
Paulson, James F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ellis, Kelsey [3 ,4 ]
Obermeyer, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Kuhn, M. Ann [1 ,2 ]
Frantz, Frazier W. [1 ,2 ]
McGuire, Margaret M. [1 ,2 ]
Ortiz, Erika [3 ]
Kelly, Robert E., Jr. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Kings Daughters, Norfolk, VA USA
[2] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, MGB 250,5115 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[4] Virginia Consortium Program Clin Psychol, Norfolk, VA USA
关键词
Pectus carinatum; Pectus excavatum; Body image; Quality of life; Validation; Questionnaire; Measure; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.03.019
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction: While body image disturbances and quality of life in persons with pectus excavatum (PE) have been well documented, very little has been done to systematically measure and document the same in patients with pectus carinatum (PC). Because of this, the current study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to assess body image related quality of life in patients with PC and their parents. Method: Participants: Two waves of data collection took place. The development phase enrolled 78 PC patients and 76 matched parents. The validation phase enrolled 50 PC patients and 50 parents. Mean age at the initiation of treatment was 15.14 (SD = 2.54). Participants were mostly boys (85.9%) and White or Caucasian (89.7%). Instrument development, refinement, and validation: A group of 5 experts in chest wall deformities used existing measures of body image disturbances in PE, combined with the broader body image literature, to develop larger item pools for patients and their parents. Item analysis from this phase was used to remove poorly performing or statistically redundant items. In the validation phase, refined patient and parent instruments were examined using exploratory principal components factor analysis (EFA) with parallel analysis for factor retention, followed by Varimax rotation to identify a final factor solution. Results/discussion: This development and refinement process yielded a final questionnaire for patients (18 items) and parents (15 items). The patient questionnaire includes four subscales, each with good internal consistency: Body Image Disturbance; Treatment Motivation/Engagement; Physical Limitations; and Social Disadvantage. The parent questionnaire includes 3 subscales: Body Image Disturbance; Treatment Motivation/Engagement; Physical Limitations. Patient and parent scales showed moderate correlations. Among patients with measures pre- and posttreatment, there was a significant improvement in overall PeCBI-QOL score. We demonstrate, in this study, that body image and related quality of life can be reliably and validly assessed with the PeCBI-QOL, which has implications for more comprehensively documenting the negative psychological and functional consequences of pectus carinatum. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2260
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and psychometric properties of the Thai Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life (GO-QOL) questionnaire
    Lumyongsatien, Mingkwan
    Keeratidamkerngsakul, Benjama
    Pornpanich, Kanokrat
    Vangveeravong, Sumalee
    Saonanon, Preamjit
    Wiwatwongwana, Damrong
    Mahaisavariya, Pornchai
    Aryasit, Orapan
    Pongpirul, Krit
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [42] Development and psychometric properties of the Thai Graves’ ophthalmopathy quality of life (GO-QOL) questionnaire
    Mingkwan Lumyongsatien
    Benjama Keeratidamkerngsakul
    Kanokrat Pornpanich
    Sumalee Vangveeravong
    Preamjit Saonanon
    Damrong Wiwatwongwana
    Pornchai Mahaisavariya
    Orapan Aryasit
    Krit Pongpirul
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [43] Development and Validation of a Quality of Life Instrument for Patients With Liver Cancer QOL-LC
    Wan, Chonghua
    Fang, Jiqian
    Yang, Zheng
    Zhang, Canzhen
    Luo, Jiahong
    Meng, Qiong
    Jiang, Dan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (05): : 448 - 455
  • [44] The quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) questionnaire: Development and validation
    Pesudovs, K
    Garamendi, E
    Elliott, DB
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2004, 81 (10) : 769 - 777
  • [45] Development and validation of the Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Juniper, EF
    Thompson, AK
    Ferrie, PJ
    Roberts, JN
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2000, 30 (01) : 132 - 140
  • [46] Development and Evaluation of an Asthma-Specific Quality of Life (A-QOL) Questionnaire
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Kim, Sang-Ha
    Choi, Jeong-Hee
    Jee, Young-Koo
    Nahm, Dong-Ho
    Park, Hae-Sim
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2009, 46 (07) : 716 - 721
  • [47] Development and validation of the disease-specific QOL-CD quality of life questionnaire for patients with Cushing's disease
    Cusimano, Michael D.
    Huang, Tony Q.
    Marchie, Anthony
    Smyth, Harley S.
    Kovacs, Kalman
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 48 (06)
  • [48] The Schizophrenia Caregiver Quality of Life questionnaire (S-CGQoL): Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia
    Richieri, R.
    Boyer, L.
    Reine, G.
    Loundou, A.
    Auquier, P.
    Lancon, C.
    Simeoni, M. C.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2011, 126 (1-3) : 192 - 201
  • [49] Finnish translation and external validation of the Trauma Quality of Life questionnaire
    Kuorikoski, Joonas
    Brinck, Tuomas
    Roine, Risto P.
    Sintonen, Harri
    Soderlund, Tim
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (07) : 1129 - 1135
  • [50] The Validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II
    Melodie K Moorehead
    Elisabeth Ardelt-Gattinger
    Hans Lechner
    Horacio E Oria
    Obesity Surgery, 2003, 13 : 684 - 692