Development and validation of the Pectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life (PeCBI-QOL) questionnaire

被引:8
|
作者
Paulson, James F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ellis, Kelsey [3 ,4 ]
Obermeyer, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Kuhn, M. Ann [1 ,2 ]
Frantz, Frazier W. [1 ,2 ]
McGuire, Margaret M. [1 ,2 ]
Ortiz, Erika [3 ]
Kelly, Robert E., Jr. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Kings Daughters, Norfolk, VA USA
[2] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, MGB 250,5115 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[4] Virginia Consortium Program Clin Psychol, Norfolk, VA USA
关键词
Pectus carinatum; Pectus excavatum; Body image; Quality of life; Validation; Questionnaire; Measure; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.03.019
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction: While body image disturbances and quality of life in persons with pectus excavatum (PE) have been well documented, very little has been done to systematically measure and document the same in patients with pectus carinatum (PC). Because of this, the current study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to assess body image related quality of life in patients with PC and their parents. Method: Participants: Two waves of data collection took place. The development phase enrolled 78 PC patients and 76 matched parents. The validation phase enrolled 50 PC patients and 50 parents. Mean age at the initiation of treatment was 15.14 (SD = 2.54). Participants were mostly boys (85.9%) and White or Caucasian (89.7%). Instrument development, refinement, and validation: A group of 5 experts in chest wall deformities used existing measures of body image disturbances in PE, combined with the broader body image literature, to develop larger item pools for patients and their parents. Item analysis from this phase was used to remove poorly performing or statistically redundant items. In the validation phase, refined patient and parent instruments were examined using exploratory principal components factor analysis (EFA) with parallel analysis for factor retention, followed by Varimax rotation to identify a final factor solution. Results/discussion: This development and refinement process yielded a final questionnaire for patients (18 items) and parents (15 items). The patient questionnaire includes four subscales, each with good internal consistency: Body Image Disturbance; Treatment Motivation/Engagement; Physical Limitations; and Social Disadvantage. The parent questionnaire includes 3 subscales: Body Image Disturbance; Treatment Motivation/Engagement; Physical Limitations. Patient and parent scales showed moderate correlations. Among patients with measures pre- and posttreatment, there was a significant improvement in overall PeCBI-QOL score. We demonstrate, in this study, that body image and related quality of life can be reliably and validly assessed with the PeCBI-QOL, which has implications for more comprehensively documenting the negative psychological and functional consequences of pectus carinatum. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2260
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL)
    Nojomi, Marzieh
    Digesu, G. Alessandro
    Khullar, Vik
    Morovatdar, Negar
    Haghighi, Ladan
    Alirezaei, Mansoureh
    Swift, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (02) : 229 - 233
  • [22] Assessing the impact of body image concerns on functioning across life domains: Development and validation of the Body Image Life Disengagement Questionnaire (BILD-Q) among British adolescents
    Atkinson, Melissa J.
    Diedrichs, Phillippa C.
    BODY IMAGE, 2021, 37 : 63 - 73
  • [23] Development and construct validation of the angioedema quality of life questionnaire
    Weller, K.
    Groffik, A.
    Magerl, M.
    Tohme, N.
    Martus, P.
    Krause, K.
    Metz, M.
    Staubach, P.
    Maurer, M.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 1289 - 1298
  • [24] Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Juniper, EF
    Guyatt, GH
    Cox, FM
    Ferrie, PJ
    King, DR
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 14 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [25] Assessing the quality of life in Indian Graves' orbitopathy patients and validation of Hindi version of GO-QOL questionnaire
    Delampady, Kishan
    Reddy, Sagili Vijaya Bhaskar
    Yadav, Subhash B.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (08) : 1617 - 1621
  • [26] Validation of a Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire for Owners of Dogs with Heart Disease
    Freeman, Lisa M.
    Rush, John E.
    Helburn, Audry M.
    ANTHROZOOS, 2018, 31 (06): : 685 - 693
  • [27] A validation study of the Japanese version of the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) and the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL)
    Morioke, Satoshi
    Takahagi, Shunsuke
    Kawano, Reo
    Fukunaga, Atsushi
    Harada, Susumu
    Ohsawa, Isao
    Masuda, Koji
    Irifuku, Reiko
    Yokobayashi, Hitomi
    Kameyoshi, Yoshikazu
    Tanaka, Akio
    Tamari, Saho
    Hide, Michihiro
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 70 (04) : 471 - 479
  • [28] Development and Validation of the Korean Version of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction and Quality of Life Questionnaire (HF-QoL-K)
    Nam, Se Hyun
    Choi, Hyun Jin
    Kang, Woo Dae
    Kim, Seok Mo
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    Kim, Jung-Sup
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    Lee, Jeong-won
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Song, Taejong
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (12) : 1969 - +
  • [29] Bi-valve braces for treatment of pectus carinatum in teenagers: impact on patients quality of life
    Mauduit, Marion
    Chermat, Anaelle
    Rojas, Dorian
    Rouze, Simon
    Delatour, Bertrand
    Verhoye, Jean-Philippe
    CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEON, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [30] Development and validation of an electronic version of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Juniper, E. F.
    Riis, B.
    Juniper, B. A.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 (09) : 1091 - 1093