A Case-control Study of Preemptive Analgesia for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Continuous Subcutaneous Morphine Alone and Combined With Intrathecal Injection

被引:5
作者
Yukawa, Yasutsugu [1 ]
Kato, Fumihiko [1 ]
Ito, Keigo [1 ]
Nakashima, Hiroaki [1 ]
Machino, Masaaki [1 ]
Hirano, Kenichi [1 ]
Tauchi, Ryoji [1 ]
机构
[1] Chubu Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 23卷 / 05期
关键词
preemptive analgesia; intrathecal morphine; continuous subcutaneous morphine; postoperative pain; TERM POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN; EPIDURAL MORPHINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; SPINAL SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b11c9c
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A case-control clinical study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain was conducted. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 2 preemptive analgesics: continuous subcutaneous morphine alone (SC) and continuous subcutaneous morphine combined with single intrathecal injection of morphine (SI). Summary of Background Data: Systemic opioids are known to be effective for controlling the postoperative pain. Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy of preemptive analgesia using morphine. In a previous study, continuous subcutaneous morphine brought some analgesic effects with a low rate of complications. However, the analgesic effect was not sufficient. Methods: Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. SC and SI procedures for preemptive analgesia were conducted for the 22 patients. All the patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. Pain management was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Moreover, use of supplemental analgesics, time of first request for supplemental analgesics, and side effects were investigated. Results: No baseline variable differences between the groups were observed. From immediately after surgery (at 0 h) to 24 hours after surgery, the VAS of the SI group was significantly lower than that of the SC group. The average VAS of the SI group was always less than 30 at any time point. No significant difference was observed in the use of supplemental analgesic drugs between the 2 groups, but the time of first request of the SC group was shorter than that of the SI group. Minor side effects were observed in 3 cases of the SC group and in 6 cases of the SI group. In 1 case of the SI group, a nasal airway was used for a few hours owing to mild respiratory depression. Conclusions: SI provided a favorable analgesic effect at any time point. The VAS score was always below 30. Major complications were not observed in either group, but more careful observation for respiratory status was required after the SI procedure. SI can be an attractive method for postoperative analgesia and accomplished with technical ease.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 337
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ashburn MA, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V100, P1573
  • [2] Intrathecal morphine - Double-blind evaluation of optimal dosage for analgesia after major lumbar spinal surgery
    Boezaart, AP
    Eksteen, JA
    Spuy, GVD
    Rossouw, R
    Knipe, M
    [J]. SPINE, 1999, 24 (11) : 1131 - 1137
  • [3] Brown DL, 2000, ANESTHESIA, V1, P1491
  • [4] Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion - Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia
    Cohen, BE
    Hartman, MB
    Wade, JT
    Miller, JS
    Gilbert, R
    Chapman, TM
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (16) : 1892 - 1896
  • [5] COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN BY IV AND SC ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION
    DOYLE, E
    MORTON, NS
    MCNICOL, LR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (05) : 533 - 536
  • [6] Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion
    Fisher, CG
    Belanger, L
    Gofton, EG
    Umedaly, HS
    Noonan, VK
    Abramson, C
    Wing, PC
    Brown, J
    Dvorak, MF
    [J]. SPINE, 2003, 28 (08) : 739 - 743
  • [7] The use of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after posterolateral lumbar fusion - A prospective, double-blind, randomized study
    France, JC
    Jorgenson, SS
    Lowe, TG
    Dwyer, AP
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (19) : 2272 - 2277
  • [8] INTRASPINAL NARCOTIC ANALGESIA - A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF
    JOHNSON, RG
    MILLER, M
    MURPHY, M
    [J]. SPINE, 1989, 14 (04) : 363 - 366
  • [9] Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and subcutaneous morphine in elderly patients after total hip replacement
    Keïta, H
    Geachan, N
    Dahmani, S
    Couderc, E
    Armand, C
    Quazza, M
    Mantz, J
    Desmonts, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [10] Preemptive analgesia - Why its effect is not always obvious
    Kissin, I
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (05) : 1015 - 1019