Defining Johnson-Neyman regions of significance in the three-covariate ANCOVA using mathematica

被引:6
作者
Hunka, S [1 ]
Leighton, J
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Educ Psychol, Edmonton, AB T6J 2G5, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Psychol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
关键词
Johnson-Neyman ANCOVA; mathematica; nonhomogeneous regression;
D O I
10.2307/1165228
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Johnson-Neyman ANCOVA, used when nonhomogeneity of within-group regressions is present, poses special computational rind plotting problems when three covariates are used. These problems can be overcome by using (a) an appropriate design and contrast matrix for the general linear model and (b) the Mathematica software system of computation to handle the symbolic and graphical processing requirements. Four-dimensional graphical representation of the polynomials which result are contour plotted in a three-dimensional space in order to define the regions of significance for contrasts. It is also shown that for some values of the covariate orthogonal contrasts are produced.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 387
页数:27
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ABELL ML, 1994, MAPLES V HDB
[2]  
BORICH GD, 1976, ANAL APTITUDE TREATM
[3]   A WORK SHEET FOR THE JOHNSON-NEYMAN TECHNIQUE [J].
Butsch, R. L. C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1944, 12 (03) :226-241
[4]   AN INTERACTIVE-COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR JOHNSON-NEYMAN TECHNIQUE IN CASE OF 2 GROUPS, 2 PREDICTOR VARIABLES, AND ONE CRITERION VARIABLE [J].
CARROLL, JB ;
WILSON, GF .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1970, 30 (01) :121-&
[5]  
CARROLL JB, 1969, RES B ED TESTING SER
[6]   COMPUTER-PROGRAM FOR THE JOHNSON-NEYMAN TECHNIQUE [J].
CEURVORST, RW .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1979, 39 (01) :205-207
[7]  
Fisher RA, 1932, STAT METHODS RES WOR
[8]  
Fisher Ronald A., 1935, DESIGN EXPT
[9]  
Huitema B. E., 1980, The analysis of covariance and alternatives
[10]   IDENTIFYING REGIONS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN ANCOVA PROBLEMS HAVING NONHOMOGENEOUS REGRESSIONS [J].
HUNKA, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 48 :161-188