An Integrated Theory of Hot Spots Patrol Strategy: Implementing Prevention by Scaling Up and Feeding Back

被引:39
作者
Sherman, Lawrence W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Williams, Stephen [6 ]
Ariel, Barak [1 ,7 ]
Strang, Lucinda R. [8 ]
Wain, Neil [4 ]
Slothower, Molly [5 ]
Norton, Andre [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Police Execut Programme, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Jerry Lee Ctr Expt Criminol, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Jerry Lee Ctr Expt Criminol, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Criminol & Criminal Justice, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[6] Trinidad & Tobago Police Serv, Port Of Spain, Trinidad Tobago
[7] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[8] Cambridge Ctr Evidence Based Policing, Cambridge, England
关键词
Hotspots; Patrol Dosage; Residual Deterrence; Displacement; Koper Curve; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CRIME; POLICE; DISPLACEMENT; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1177/1043986214525082
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In late 2013, Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) conducted the first randomized experiment ever to test a hot spots patrol strategy (HSPS) across large areas, as distinct from testing extra patrols one hot spot at a time. The HSPS experiment required, and helped to refine, a formal theory of both the causes and effects of directed patrols in hot spots. This article presents an integrated theory of how to implement an HSPS in ways that maximize the preventive effects of patrol on crime. It then describes the HSPS experimental protocol used to test the theory in Trinidad. The key elements of HSPS are scaling up from specific hot spot locations to a district-wide focus on all its hot spots and feeding back to the constables who provide hot spots patrols data on what they have done and with what effect-presented every 2 weeks, at a district-level "COP-stat" meeting with the people actually doing the patrols.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 122
页数:28
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PREVENTING CRIME WHA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INTERACTIONAL RITUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, JUSTICE Q
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1965, FEM THEOR
[5]  
Ariel B., TESTING LOCAL DETERR
[6]  
Bottoms A, 2012, J CRIM LAW CRIM, V102, P119
[7]  
Boydstun J., 1975, San Diego Field Interrogation: Final Report
[8]  
Braga A., 2012, Justice Quarterly, V8, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07418825.2012.673632, DOI 10.4073/CSR.2012.6, DOI 10.4073/CSR.2012.8]
[9]  
Braga A. A., 2010, POLICING PROBLEM PLA
[10]   Between proportionality & impunity:: Confrontation &DRARR; truth ⇒ prevention [J].
Braithwaite, J .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2005, 43 (02) :283-305