Survival benefit of liver transplantation and the effect of underlying liver disease

被引:17
作者
Gleisner, Ana L. [3 ,6 ]
Munoz, Alvaro [7 ]
Brandao, Ajacio [4 ,5 ]
Marroni, Claudio [4 ,5 ]
Zanotelli, Maria Lucia [1 ,4 ]
Cantisani, Guido Gracco [1 ,4 ]
Moreira, Leila Beltrami [2 ]
Choti, Michael A. [8 ]
Pawlik, Timothy M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Complexo Hosp, Dept Surg, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Complexo Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Complexo Hosp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Complexo Hosp, Liver Transplantat Grp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Ciencias Sau Porto Alegre, Dept Internal Med, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
[6] St Louis Univ, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ORGAN ALLOCATION; WAITING-LIST; MELD SCORE; PROPORTIONAL-HAZARDS; MODEL; 1ST; RECIPIENTS; MORTALITY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The benefit of liver transplantation relative to initial degree of underlying liver disease and time on the waiting list. remains poorly defined. We sought, to examine the survival benefit attributable to liver transplantation across a wide range of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Methods. The study population included patients with, end.-stage liver disease enlisted in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between. 2001 and 2005. Survival and hazard function for enlisted and transplanted patients were estimated using parametric and nonparametric methods. MELD score was utilized to account for underlying liver disease. Results. Of 1, 130 eligible patients, 520 (46.0%) were transplanted, 266 (23.5%) died on the waiting list, 141 (12.5%) were excluded from the waiting list,, and 203 (18.0%) remained enlisted and were awaiting transplantation. at. the time of last observation. At 1 year after transplantation, a MELD score of 15 represented a transition point in terms Of overall survival benefit (MELD 10, 90% vs 83%; MELD 15, 81% vs 80%; MELD 20, 63% vs 78%; MELD 25, 42% vs 74%; MELD 30, 21% vs 71%; enlisted vs transplant patients, respectively). MELD scores id which transplantation seemed to be beneficial relative to the amount of follow-up time Was MELD 23, 17, 15, and 12 at 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively, from time of transplantation/enlistment. Conclusion. Although patients with greater MELD scores enjoy a pronounced and early benefit from, transplantation, patients with lesser MELD scores do gain from transplantation, although a greater Period of time is needed to realize the survival benefit. (Surgery, 2010;147:392-404.)
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 404
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis [J].
Mazzaferro, V ;
Regalia, E ;
Doci, R ;
Andreola, S ;
Pulvirenti, A ;
Bozzetti, F ;
Montalto, F ;
Ammatuna, M ;
Morabito, A ;
Gennari, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) :693-699
[12]  
Mckay D, 2008, PROG TRANSPLANT, V18, P203
[13]   The survival benefit of liver transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Freeman, RB ;
Port, FK ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (02) :307-313
[14]   When is a patient too well and when is a patient too sick for a liver transplant? [J].
Merion, RM .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :S69-S73
[15]   A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation [J].
Onaca, NN ;
Levy, MF ;
Sanchez, EQ ;
Chinnakotla, S ;
Fasola, CG ;
Thomas, MJ ;
Weinstein, JS ;
Murray, NG ;
Goldstein, RM ;
Klintmalm, GB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (02) :117-123
[16]   Long-term survival with non-proportional hazards: results from the Dutch Gastric cancer Trial [J].
Putter, H ;
Sasako, M ;
Hartgrink, HH ;
van de Velde, CJH ;
van Houwelingen, JC .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (18) :2807-2821
[17]   Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects [J].
Royston, P ;
Parmar, MKB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (15) :2175-2197
[18]  
Rubin DB, 2004, MULTIPLE IMPUTATION
[19]   The epidemiology of hepatitis C infection in the United States [J].
Rustgi, Vinod K. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 42 (07) :513-521
[20]   Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center [J].
Santori, G. ;
Andorno, E. ;
Morelli, N. ;
Casaccia, M. ;
Bottino, G. ;
Ghirelli, R. ;
Valente, U. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) :1903-1905