Coupling machine learning, tree-based and statistical models with cellular automata to simulate urban growth

被引:107
|
作者
Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein [1 ]
Asghari, Ali [2 ]
Tayyebi, Amin [3 ]
Taleai, Mohammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept GIS & Remote Sensing, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ, RS & GIS Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Geospatial Big Data Engn, Monsanto, MO USA
[4] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Machine learning models; Tree-based models; Statistical models; Cellular automata; Error map; Accuracy assessment; LAND-USE CHANGE; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS; TRANSFORMATION MODEL; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RANDOM FORESTS; PERFORMANCE; CA;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper compares six land use change (LUC) models, including artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), classification and regression trees (CART), logistic regression (LR), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). These models were used to simulate urban growth in the mega city of Tehran Metropolitan Area (TMA). These LUC models were integrated with cellular automata (CA) and validated using a variety of goodness-of-fit metrics. The results showed that the percent correct metrics (PCMs) varied between 54.6% for LR and 59.6% for MARS, while the area under curve (AUC) ranged from 67.6% for LR to 74.7% for ANNs. The results also showed a considerable difference between the spatial patterns within the error maps. The results of this comparative study will enable decision makers and scholars to better understand the performance of the models when reducing the number of misses and false alarms is a priority. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Runtime Optimizations for Tree-based Machine Learning Models
    Asadi, Nima
    Lin, Jimmy
    de Vries, Arjen P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2014, 26 (09) : 2281 - 2292
  • [2] Scalable Tree-based Register Automata Learning
    Dierl, Simon
    Fiterau-Brostean, Paul
    Howar, Falk
    Jonsson, Bengt
    Sagonas, Konstantinos
    Taquist, Fredrik
    TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, PT II, TACAS 2024, 2024, 14571 : 87 - 108
  • [3] Using fuzzy cellular automata to access and simulate urban growth
    Mantelas, Lefteris
    Prastacos, Poulicos
    Hatzichristos, Thomas
    Koutsopoulos, Kostis
    GEOJOURNAL, 2012, 77 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [4] Tree-Based Methods for Statistical Learning in R
    Hu, Jianchang
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 64 (08) : 1500 - 1501
  • [5] Urban flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and multiple decision tree-based machine learning models
    Dey, Hemal
    Shao, Wanyun
    Moradkhani, Hamid
    Keim, Barry D.
    Peter, Brad G.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (11) : 10365 - 10393
  • [6] Flood susceptibility prediction using tree-based machine learning models in the GBA
    Lyu, Hai -Min
    Yin, Zhen-Yu
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 97
  • [7] Assessment of flood susceptibility prediction based on optimized tree-based machine learning models
    Eslaminezhad, Seyed Ahmad
    Eftekhari, Mobin
    Azma, Aliasghar
    Kiyanfar, Ramin
    Akbari, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (06) : 2353 - 2385
  • [8] Insights into fruit tree models relevant to simulate fruit tree-based agroforestry systems
    Barbault, N.
    Dupraz, C.
    Lauri, P. E.
    Gosme, M.
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2024, 98 (04) : 817 - 835
  • [9] Insights into fruit tree models relevant to simulate fruit tree-based agroforestry systems
    N. Barbault
    C. Dupraz
    P. E. Lauri
    M. Gosme
    Agroforestry Systems, 2024, 98 : 817 - 835
  • [10] A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Cellular Automata Model to Simulate Urban Growth
    Mustafa, Ahmed
    Nishida, Gen
    Saadi, Ismail
    Cools, Mario
    Teller, Jacques
    NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, AND SERVICES (GEOPROCESSING 2017), 2017, : 73 - 74