Development and clinical validation of a novel photography-based skin erythema evaluation system: a comparison with the calculated consensus of dermatologists

被引:5
作者
Cho, M. [1 ]
Lee, D. -H. [2 ]
Doh, E. J. [2 ]
Kim, Y. [3 ]
Chung, J. H. [2 ]
Kim, H. C. [4 ,5 ]
Kim, S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch, Interdisciplinary Program Bioengn, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Engn, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Med & Biol Engn, Seoul 151742, South Korea
关键词
melanogenesis; sensitive skin/inflammation/allergy; skin repair/acne/rosacea/dandruff/striae; spectroscopy; UV/VIS/fluo/CD; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; PIGMENTATION; LESIONS; PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS; COLOR; TELANGIECTASIA; MEXAMETER((R)); SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/ics.12393
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
ObjectiveErythema is the most common presenting sign in patients with skin diseases, and various methods to treat erythema symptoms have become common. To evaluate changes in erythema, a reliable device that can support objective diagnosis is required. We developed a novel photography-based system for erythema diagnosis that provides a high-resolution three-view photograph taken in a consistent photography environment with a curved surface light source and can be integrated with optimized image processing algorithms. MethodsA new diagnostic algorithm was applied to photographs from 32 patients to determine areas of erythema automatically. To assess the performance in comparison to dermatologists' evaluations, five dermatologists independently evaluate the areas of erythema, and we defined an area called the clinical consensus area of erythema (CCAE), which is based on the majority opinion of dermatologists during evaluation. The CCAE values obtained were compared with the erythema areas determined by the system's diagnostic algorithm. ResultsForty-one photographs with areas of erythema were evaluated by the proposed system and by dermatologists. The results obtained with the proposed system had a mean accuracy of 93.18% with a standard deviation of 3.52% when compared with the CCAE results. The results also showed that the proposed system could detect erythema areas without any pigmentation. In contrast to assessments by individual dermatologists, use of the CCAE reduced the amount of error that occurred owing to bias or subjectivity. ConclusionA new erythema evaluation system was developed and validated through CCAE, suggesting that the system can support dermatologists' objective diagnoses of erythema.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Al-Tairi ZH, 2014, J INF PROCESS SYST, V10, P283
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J ENG RES TECHNO
[3]  
[Anonymous], ELECT ENG C 2014 INT
[4]  
Baker H.C., 2013, J FORENSIC IDENTIFIC, V63, P103
[5]   Discrimination between cutaneous pigmentation and erythema: Comparison of the skin colorimeters Dermacatch and Mexameter [J].
Baquie, M. ;
Kasraee, B. .
SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 20 (02) :218-227
[6]  
Berardesca E., 2013, NON INVASIVE DIAGNOS, P187
[7]  
Canfieldsci, VIS COMPL AN
[8]   An improved biogeography based optimization approach for segmentation of human head CT-scan images employing fuzzy entropy [J].
Chatterjee, Amitava ;
Siarry, Patrick ;
Nakib, Amir ;
Blanc, Raphael .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 25 (08) :1698-1709
[9]   Development and clinical validation of a novel photography-based skin pigmentation evaluation system: a comparison with the calculated consensus of dermatologists [J].
Cho, M. ;
Lee, D. -H. ;
Kim, Y. ;
Koh, W. ;
Chung, J. H. ;
Kim, H. C. ;
Kim, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE, 2016, 38 (04) :399-408
[10]   Characteristics of subjective recognition and computer-aided image analysis of facial erythematous skin diseases: a cornerstone of automated diagnosis [J].
Choi, J. W. ;
Kim, B. R. ;
Lee, H. S. ;
Youn, S. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 (02) :252-258