Pros and Cons of Prostate Cancer Screening: Associations With Screening Knowledge and Attitudes Among Urban African American Men

被引:19
作者
Davis, Stacy N. [1 ]
Diefenbach, Michael A. [2 ]
Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Tianle [6 ]
Hall, Simon J. [2 ]
Thompson, Hayley S. [7 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Deane Prostate Hlth & Res Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Oncol Sci, New York, NY USA
[4] Reykjavik Univ, Sch Hlth & Educ, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Univ Iceland, Dept Psychol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[6] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[7] Yeshiva Univ, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
African Americans; men's health; physician-patient relationship; prostate cancer screening; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30523-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Discussion of the pros and cons of prostate cancer screening tests, rather than routine screening, is recommended to support informed screening decisions, particularly among African American men. This study explored physician explanation of pros and cons of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and digital rectal exam (DRE) and its association with knowledge and screening attitudes. Two hundred-one African American men were asked if a physician had ever provided a comprehensive explanation of pros and cons of the PSA test and DRE. All men completed a 10-item prostate cancer knowledge scale and a subset completed a 26-item attitudes measure. Only 13% of the sample reported receiving a comprehensive explanation. Also, prostate cancer knowledge in the sample was low (mean = 43% correct). Multivariate analyses revealed that total prostate cancer knowledge was associated with men receiving a comprehensive explanation (p=.05), as well as past prostate cancer screening (p=.02) and younger age (p=.009). Although comprehensive explanation of prostate cancer screening was related to total prostate cancer knowledge, it was unrelated to a subset of items that may be central to fully informed screening decisions. Furthermore, comprehensive explanation of prostate cancer screening (p=.02), along with DRE recommendation (p=.009) and older age (p=.02), were related to fewer negative screening attitudes. Findings suggest that continued focus on patient education and physician communication is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM UR ASS FDN, 2007, PROST CANC GUID MAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CANC FACTS FIG 2009
[3]  
Ashford AR, 2001, CANCER, V91, P164, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<164::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-A
[5]   Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems [J].
Briss, P ;
Rimer, B ;
Reilley, B ;
Coates, RC ;
Lee, NC ;
Mullen, P ;
Corso, P ;
Hutchinson, AB ;
Hiatt, R ;
Kerner, J ;
George, P ;
White, C ;
Gandhi, N ;
Saraiya, M ;
Breslow, R ;
Isham, G ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Hinman, AR ;
Lawrence, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (01) :67-80
[6]  
CHAN EC, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P394
[7]   To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test [J].
Cooper, CP ;
Merritt, TL ;
Ross, LE ;
John, LV ;
Jorgensen, CM .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (02) :182-191
[8]   American College of Preventive Medicine practice policy - Screening for prostate cancer in American men [J].
Ferrini, R ;
Woolf, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (01) :81-84
[9]   Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study [J].
Guerra, Carmen E. ;
Jacobs, Samantha E. ;
Holmes, John H. ;
Shea, Judy A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (07) :901-907
[10]   Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making Under Controversy: Implications for Health Promotion Practice [J].
Gwede, Clement K. ;
McDermott, Robert J. .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2006, 7 (01) :134-146