Modeling Excess Lung Cancer Risk Among Screened Arm Participants in the Mayo Lung Project

被引:4
作者
Goldwasser, Deborah L. [1 ,2 ]
Kimmel, Marek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Stat, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Silesian Tech Univ, Syst Engn Grp, Gliwice, Poland
关键词
lung cancer screening; mathematical model; simulation; Mayo Lung Project; ATOMIC-BOMB SURVIVORS; MULTISTAGE CARCINOGENESIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SOLID CANCER; FOLLOW-UP; RADIATION; OVERDIAGNOSIS; CHEST; MORTALITY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24722
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) was a randomized clinical trial designed to test whether periodic screening by chest x-ray reduced lung cancer (LC) mortality in men who were high-risk smokers. Among MLP participants, there were more deaths from LC in the screening arm both at the trial's end and after long-term follow-up. Overdiagnosis was cited widely as an explanation for the MLP results, whereas a role for excess LC risk attributable to undergoing numerous chest x-ray screenings largely was unexamined. The authors of this report examined the consistency of the MLP data with a modified 2-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model of excess LC risk. METHODS: By using a simulation model calibrated to the initial MLP data, the authors examined the expected statistical variance of LC incidence and mortality between the screening and control arms. A Bayesian estimation framework using a modified version of the TSCE model to evaluate the role of excess LC risk attributable to chest x-ray screening was derived and applied to the MLP data. RESULTS: Simulation experiments indicated that the overall difference in LC deaths and incidence between the study arm and the control arm was unlikely (P = .0424 and P = .0104, respectively) assuming no excess risk of LC. The authors estimated that the 10-year excess LC risk for a man aged 60 years who smoked and who received 10 chest x-ray screenings was 0.574% (P = .0021). CONCLUSIONS: The excess LC risk observed among screening arm participants was found to be statistically significant with respect to the TSCE model framework in part because of the incorporation of key risk correlates of age and screen frequency into the estimation framework. Cancer 2010;116:122-31. Published 2010 American Cancer Society*
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 131
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A 2-STAGE THEORY OF CARCINOGENESIS IN RELATION TO THE AGE DISTRIBUTION OF HUMAN CANCER [J].
ARMITAGE, P ;
DOLL, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (02) :161-169
[2]   Screening for lung cancer - ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Silvestri, Gerard A. ;
Hanger, Morgan ;
Jett, Jaines R. .
CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) :69S-77S
[3]   Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays:: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [J].
Berrington de González, A ;
Darby, S .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9406) :345-351
[4]   Overdiagnosis: An underrecognized cause of confusion and harm in cancer screening [J].
Black, WC .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (16) :1280-1282
[5]   Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer [J].
Brenner, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :440-445
[6]  
BRENNER DJ, 2006, RADIAT ENVIRON BIOPH, V44, P252
[7]   Pathologic review of the Mayo Lung Project - Is there a case for misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of lung carcinoma in the screened group? [J].
Colby, TV ;
Tazelaar, HD ;
Travis, WD ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Jeff, JR .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (11) :2361-2365
[8]  
Diederich S, 2000, CANCER, V89, P2457, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2457::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-7
[10]  
FLEHINGER BJ, 1993, CANCER, V72, P1573, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::AID-CNCR2820720514>3.0.CO