Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening

被引:39
作者
Gili, Alessio [1 ]
Paggi, Riccardo [2 ]
Russo, Carla [2 ]
Cenci, Elio [2 ]
Pietrella, Donatella [2 ]
Graziani, Alessandro [2 ]
Stracci, Fabrizio [1 ]
Mencacci, Antonella [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Dept Med & Surg, Publ Hlth Sect, Perugia, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Med & Surg, Microbiol & Clin Microbiol, Perugia, Italy
关键词
Lumipulse (R); Antigen NP; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Diagnosis; Screening; CORONAVIRUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the Lumipulse (R) SARS-CoV-2 antigen test with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to evaluate its role in screening programs. Methods: Lumipulse (R) SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay was compared with the gold standard RT-PCR test in a selected cohort of 226 subjects with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its accuracy was evaluated. Subsequently, the test was administered to a real-life screening cohort of 1738 cases. ROC analysis was performed to explore test features and cutoffs. All tests were performed in the regional reference laboratory in Umbria, Italy. Results: A 42.0% positive result at RT-PCR was observed in the selected cohort. The Lumipulse (R) system showed 92.6% sensitivity (95% CI 85.4-97.0%) and 90.8% specificity (95% CI 84.5-95.2%) at 1.24 pg/mL optimal cutoff. In the screening cohort, characterized by 5.2% prevalence of infection, Lumipulse (R) assay showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI 96.0-100.0%) and 94.8% specificity (95% CI 93.6-95.8%) at 1.645 pg/mL optimal cutoff; the AUC was 97.4%, NPV was 100% (95% CI 99.8-100.0%) and PPV was 51.1% (95% CI 43.5-58.7%). Conclusions: The Lumipulse (R) SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay can be safely employed in the screening strategies in small and large communities and in the general population. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 396
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, Euronews
  • [2] Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2
    Azzi, Lorenzo
    Carcano, Giulio
    Gianfagna, Francesco
    Grossi, Paolo
    Dalla Gasperina, Daniela
    Genoni, Angelo
    Fasano, Mauro
    Sessa, Fausto
    Tettamanti, Lucia
    Carinci, Francesco
    Maurino, Vittorio
    Rossi, Agostino
    Tagliabue, Angelo
    Baj, Andreina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2020, 81 (01) : E45 - E50
  • [3] Can the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Cycle Threshold Value and Time From Symptom Onset to Testing Predict Infectivity?
    Binnicker, Matthew J.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) : 2667 - 2668
  • [4] Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples
    Bullard, Jared
    Dust, Kerry
    Funk, Duane
    Strong, James E.
    Alexander, David
    Garnett, Lauren
    Boodman, Carl
    Bello, Alexander
    Hedley, Adam
    Schiffman, Zachary
    Doan, Kaylie
    Bastien, Nathalie
    Li, Yan
    Van Caeseele, Paul G.
    Poliquin, Guillaume
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) : 2663 - 2666
  • [5] Burki T, 2020, LANCET MICROBE, V1, pE317, DOI 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30205-6
  • [6] Coronavirus in China
    Burki, Talha Khan
    [J]. LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (03) : 238 - 238
  • [7] Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China
    Cao, Shiyi
    Gan, Yong
    Wang, Chao
    Bachmann, Max
    Wei, Shanbo
    Gong, Jie
    Huang, Yuchai
    Wang, Tiantian
    Li, Liqing
    Lu, Kai
    Jiang, Heng
    Gong, Yanhong
    Xu, Hongbin
    Shen, Xin
    Tian, Qingfeng
    Lv, Chuanzhu
    Song, Fujian
    Yin, Xiaoxv
    Lu, Zuxun
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [8] Statistics notes - Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7458): : 168 - 169
  • [9] ECDC, 2021, RISK ASS RISK REL SP
  • [10] ECDC, 2020, DIAGN TEST SCREEN SA