Port infrastructure efficiency: the Europe-Mediterranean case

被引:8
作者
Liu, Qianwen [1 ]
Medda, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Transport Studies, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
container port; infrastructure efficiency; stochastic frontier analysis; SFA; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER MODEL; CONTAINER;
D O I
10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027680
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The objective of this research is to estimate the infrastructure efficiency of individual ports, to investigate factors that influence efficiency and to shed light on infrastructure investment strategies. Thirty-two container ports in Europe-Mediterranean area have been assessed using stochastic frontier analysis. The result indicates the exogenous (environmental) factors, trading volume, which has a strong impact on port efficiency. Moreover, the infrastructure efficiency is improving over time, but the annual percentage change in output is slower than the technological change. This phenomenon is suggested due to over capacity, one of the most featured characteristics in container port industry. Different investment strategies to utilise and control over capacity in port management practice have been explored and suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 385
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The role of local institutions in cooperative banks? efficiency. The case of Italy [J].
Agostino, Mariarosaria ;
Ruberto, Sabrina ;
Trivieri, Francesco .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 84 :84-103
[42]   Locating dry ports on a network: a case study on Tianjin Port [J].
Wang, Chuanxu ;
Chen, Qian ;
Huang, Rongbing .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 45 (01) :71-88
[43]   Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals) [J].
Tongzon, J ;
Heng, W .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (05) :405-424
[44]   Do Country Risks Matter for Tourism efficiency? Evidence from Mediterranean countries [J].
Frifita, Manel ;
Hadhek, Zouhair .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, :5093-5142
[45]   Cost efficiency benchmarking of urban water supply utilities: The case of an Indian state [J].
Vishwakarma, Amit ;
Kulshrestha, Mukul ;
Nyathikala, Sai Amulya ;
Kulshreshtha, Mudit .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 30 (1-2) :77-87
[46]   Transient and persistent technical efficiency and its determinants: the case of crop farms in Austria [J].
Addo, Felicity ;
Salhofer, Klaus .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (25) :2916-2932
[47]   Logistics strategy simulation of second-ranked ports on the basis of Japan's port reforms: a case study of Hakata Port [J].
Sugimura, Yoshihisa ;
Wakashima, Hisayuki ;
Liang, Zirui ;
Shibasaki, Ryuichi .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 50 (06) :707-723
[48]   Assessing the Impact of Disruptive Events on Port Performance and Choice: The Case of Gothenburg [J].
Svanberg, Martin ;
Holm, Henrik ;
Cullinane, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (02) :1-17
[49]   Balancing environmental concerns and efficiency in Mediterranean fisheries: Economics of production with a look at market trends [J].
Ceccacci, Alberto ;
Mulazzani, Luca ;
Malorgio, Giulio .
AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES, 2024, 37
[50]   Technical efficiency of goat farming in the Western Mediterranean Region of Turkey by Stochastic Frontier Analysis [J].
Yilmaz, Serife Gulden ;
Gul, Mevlut .
CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2020, 16 (04) :165-184