Achieving and Maintaining CMMI Maturity Level 5 in a Small Organization

被引:9
作者
Falessi, Davide [1 ]
Shaw, Michele [2 ]
Mullen, Kathleen [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Ctr Expt Software Engn, Measurement & Knowledge Management Div, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] Fraunhofer Ctr Expt Software Engn, College Pk, MD USA
[3] Keymind, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/MS.2014.17
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) models are collections of best practices that help organizations improve their processes. This article reports on the authors' experience in achieving and maintaining CMMI Maturity Level 5 in a small organization. Economic achievements, success factors, and lessons learned are reported by using real-life examples from almost 10 years of improvement process. This article could be a valuable and unique reference for practitioners intending to pursue high-maturity CMMI level, particularly in small organization settings. The importance of this topic and lack of similar experience reports make it a valuable contribution to the state of the practice. The first Web extra at http://youtu.be/HMbgNSFxkpE is an audio recording in which IEEE Software Multimedia Editor Davide Falessi speaks with Shane Oleson and Shannon Taylor of Keymind about how the organization achieved and maintained CMMI Maturity Level 5. The second Web extra at http://youtu.be/RKpKBo7roZI is an audio recording in which author Kathy Mullen introduces a custom Web-based tool called the Keymind Measurement Reporting Tool. © 1984-2012 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] THE TAME PROJECT - TOWARDS IMPROVEMENT-ORIENTED SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS
    BASILI, VR
    ROMBACH, HD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1988, 14 (06) : 758 - 773
  • [2] Chrissis M. B., 2011, SEI SERIES SOFTWARE, P688
  • [3] Software process improvement in small organizations: A case study
    Dangle, KC
    Larsen, P
    Shaw, M
    Zelkowitz, MV
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2005, 22 (06) : 68 - +
  • [4] On Failure Classification: The Impact of "Getting It Wrong"
    Falessi, Davide
    Kidwell, Bill
    Hayes, Jane Huffman
    Shull, Forrest
    [J]. 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE COMPANION 2014), 2014, : 512 - 515
  • [5] Garcia-Miller S., 2005, LESSONS LEARNED ADOP
  • [6] Harjumaa L, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3009, P62
  • [7] Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises:: a systematic review
    Pino, Francisco J.
    Garcia, Felix
    Piattini, Mario
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2008, 16 (02) : 237 - 261
  • [8] Schumacher Jan., 2010, Proc. ACMIEEE Int. Symp. on Empirical Software Eng. and Measurement. ESEM '10, V8, P1, DOI [10.1145/1852786.1852797, DOI 10.1145/1852786.1852797]
  • [9] Systematic review of organizational motivations for adopting CMM-based SPI
    Staples, Mark
    Niazi, Mahmood
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 50 (7-8) : 605 - 620
  • [10] An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI
    Staples, Mark
    Niazi, Mahmood
    Jeffery, Ross
    Abrahams, Alan
    Byatt, Paul
    Murphy, Russell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2007, 80 (06) : 883 - 895