Structured Pairing in a First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory: The Effects on Student Retention, Attitudes, and Teamwork

被引:0
作者
Fila, Nicholas D. [1 ]
Loui, Michael C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Educ, Potter Engn Ctr 238, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Coordinated Sci Lab 212, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cooperative learning; pair programming; laboratory; assessment; mixed methods; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; ACHIEVEMENT; HANDS; WORK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper describes a simple technique, structured pairing, for organizing student teams in engineering instructional laboratories. This technique was adapted from pair programming, which was previously found to improve student confidence, satisfaction, and retention in computer science. A study of structured pairing was implemented in a large required course for first-year students in electrical and computer engineering. Six laboratory sections implemented structured pairing, and the other seven laboratory sections operated in a traditional way (i.e., unstructured team interactions). Data were collected from a student survey, two focus groups, and course enrollment records. Structured pairing students reported significantly higher confidence in laboratory tasks and satisfaction with the course and teamwork experiences. Focus group data indicated that structured pairing students experienced reciprocal scaffolding (i.e., students acknowledged that they learned from each other). Short-term retention in engineering did not differ significantly between structured pairing and traditional section students. These findings suggest that structured pairing is a more engaging and motivating alternative to traditional laboratory teaming methods.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 861
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]  
Patil R, 2012, INT J ENG EDUC, V28, P1141
[42]  
Perdukova D, 2013, INT J ENG EDUC, V29, P230
[43]   Does active learning work? A review of the research [J].
Prince, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2004, 93 (03) :223-231
[44]   The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test [J].
Ruxton, GD .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 17 (04) :688-690
[45]   Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Salleh, Norsaremah ;
Mendes, Emilia ;
Grundy, John C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2011, 37 (04) :509-525
[46]  
Sheppard S.D., 2009, ED ENG DESIGNING FUT
[47]   Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know [J].
Slavin, RE .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 21 (01) :43-69
[48]  
Smith K. A., 1981, Frontiers in Education Eleventh Annual Conference, P28
[49]   Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis [J].
Springer, L ;
Stanne, ME ;
Donovan, SS .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 69 (01) :21-51
[50]   A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics [J].
Stamovlasis, Dimitrios ;
Dimos, Andreas ;
Tsaparlis, Georgios .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2006, 43 (06) :556-576