Structured Pairing in a First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory: The Effects on Student Retention, Attitudes, and Teamwork

被引:0
作者
Fila, Nicholas D. [1 ]
Loui, Michael C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Educ, Potter Engn Ctr 238, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Coordinated Sci Lab 212, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cooperative learning; pair programming; laboratory; assessment; mixed methods; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; ACHIEVEMENT; HANDS; WORK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper describes a simple technique, structured pairing, for organizing student teams in engineering instructional laboratories. This technique was adapted from pair programming, which was previously found to improve student confidence, satisfaction, and retention in computer science. A study of structured pairing was implemented in a large required course for first-year students in electrical and computer engineering. Six laboratory sections implemented structured pairing, and the other seven laboratory sections operated in a traditional way (i.e., unstructured team interactions). Data were collected from a student survey, two focus groups, and course enrollment records. Structured pairing students reported significantly higher confidence in laboratory tasks and satisfaction with the course and teamwork experiences. Focus group data indicated that structured pairing students experienced reciprocal scaffolding (i.e., students acknowledged that they learned from each other). Short-term retention in engineering did not differ significantly between structured pairing and traditional section students. These findings suggest that structured pairing is a more engaging and motivating alternative to traditional laboratory teaming methods.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 861
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Applying Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education
    Abdulwahed, Mahmoud
    Nagy, Zoltan K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2009, 98 (03) : 283 - 294
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
  • [3] Bandura A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
  • [4] Besterfield-Sacre M., 1998, J ENG EDUC, V87, P133, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1998.TB00333.X
  • [5] Bingöl O, 2012, INT J ENG EDUC, V28, P713
  • [6] Braught G., 2011, ACM T COMPUTING ED, V11
  • [7] RESTRUCTURING THE CLASSROOM - CONDITIONS FOR PRODUCTIVE SMALL-GROUPS
    COHEN, EG
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 64 (01) : 1 - 35
  • [8] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [9] Changing the laboratory: Effects of a laboratory course on students' attitudes and perceptions
    Cooper, Melanie M.
    Kerns, Timothy S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 83 (09) : 1356 - 1361
  • [10] Corter J. E., 2007, ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact., V14, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/1275511.1275513