INDUCED TRANSDUCER ORIENTATION DURING ULTRASOUND IMAGING: EFFECTS ON ABDOMINAL MUSCLE THICKNESS AND BLADDER POSITION

被引:35
作者
Whittaker, Jackie L. [1 ,2 ]
Warner, Martin B. [2 ]
Stokes, Maria J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Whittaker Physiotherapy Consulting, White Rock, BC V4A 1N2, Canada
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Bladder position; Transversus abdominis; Ultrasound imaging; Ultrasound transducer; Validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; PELVIC FLOOR; DRAWING-IN; WALL; TRANSPERINEAL; MOVEMENT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.018
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The use of ultrasound imaging (USI) by physiotherapists to assess muscle behavior in clinical settings is increasing. However, there is relatively little evidence of whether the clinical environment is conducive to valid and reliable measurements. Accurate USI measurements depend on maintaining a relatively stationary transducer position, because motion may distort the image and lead to erroneous conclusions. This would seem particularly important during dynamic studies typical of a physiotherapy assessment. What is not known is how much transducer motion can occur before error is introduced. The aim of this study is to shed some light on this question. Eight healthy volunteers (19 to 52 y) participated. USI images were taken of the lateral abdominal wall (LAW) and bladder base (midline suprapubic) at various manually induced transducer orientations (approximately -10 to 10 degrees about 3 axes of rotation), which were quantified by a digital optical motion capture system. Measurements of transversus abdominis (TrA) thickness and bladder base position (cranial /caudal and anterior/posterior) were calculated. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to determine if the measurements obtained at the induced transducer orientations were statistically different (p < 0.05) from an image corresponding to a reference or starting transducer orientation. Motion analysis data corresponding to measurements that did not differ from reference image measurements were summarized to provide a range of acceptable transducer motion (relative to the pelvis) for clockwise (CW)/counter-clockwise (CCW) rotation, cranial/caudal tilting, medial/lateral tilting and inward/outward displacement. There were no significant changes in TrA thickness measurements if CW/CCW transducer motion was <9 degrees and cranial/caudal or medial/lateral transducer tilting was <5 degrees. Further, there were no significant changes in measurements of bladder base position if CW/CCW transducer motion was <10 degrees, cranial/caudal or medial/lateral transducer tilting was <10 degrees and 8 degrees, respectively and inward/outward motion was <8 mm. These findings provide guidance on acceptable amounts of transducer motion relative to the pelvis when generating measurements of TrA thickness and bladder base position. Future sonographic studies and clinical assessment investigating these parameters could take these findings into account to improve imaging technique reliability. (E-mail: j.l.whittaker@soton.ac.uk) (C) 2009 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1811
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J ORTHOP RES
  • [2] Postpartum characteristics of rectus abdominis on ultrasound imaging
    Coldron, Yvonne
    Stokes, Maria J.
    Newham, Di J.
    Cook, Katy
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2008, 13 (02) : 112 - 121
  • [3] Real-time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: Comparison with MRI and CT
    Dupont, AC
    Sauerbrei, EE
    Fenton, PV
    Shragge, PC
    Loeb, GE
    Richmond, FJR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2001, 29 (04) : 230 - 236
  • [4] CHANGES IN PENNATION WITH JOINT ANGLE AND MUSCLE TORQUE - IN-VIVO MEASUREMENTS IN HUMAN BRACHIALIS MUSCLE
    HERBERT, RD
    GANDEVIA, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1995, 484 (02): : 523 - 532
  • [5] An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during "drawing-in" of the abdominal wall
    Hides, J
    Wilson, S
    Stanton, W
    McMahon, S
    Keto, H
    McMahon, K
    Bryant, M
    Richardson, C
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) : E175 - E178
  • [6] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY OF THE LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE - COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT MODALITIES
    HIDES, JA
    RICHARDSON, CA
    JULL, GA
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [7] Ultrasound imaging assessment of abdominal muscle function during drawing-in of the abdominal wall: An intrarater reliability study
    Hides, Julie A.
    Miokovic, Tanja
    Belavy, Daniel L.
    Stanton, Warren R.
    Richardson, Carolyn A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 37 (08) : 480 - 486
  • [8] PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME RESEARCH - METHODS FOR REPORTING VARIABILITY AND EVALUATING CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE
    JACOBSON, NS
    FOLLETTE, WC
    REVENSTORF, D
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1984, 15 (04) : 336 - 352
  • [9] A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls
    Kiesel, Kyle B.
    Underwood, Frank B.
    Matacolla, Carl
    Nitz, Arthur J.
    Malone, Terry R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 37 (10) : 596 - 607
  • [10] The effect of ultrasound probe orientation on muscle architecture measurement
    Klimstra, Marc
    Dowling, Jim
    Durkin, Jennifer L.
    MacDonald, Maureen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 504 - 514