Health care utilization and expenditure inequities in India: Benefit incidence analysis

被引:5
作者
Yadav, Jeetendra [1 ,5 ]
Devi, Savita [2 ]
Singh, Mahesh Nath [3 ]
Manchanda, Navneet [4 ]
Moradhawaj [4 ]
机构
[1] ICMR, Natl Inst Med Stat, Dept Hlth Res, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] 578-237 Raj Kamal Vihar,Hydle Colony Rd,Sarojani N, Lucknow 226008, India
[3] State Inst Hlth & Family Welf Lucknow, Lucknow 226016, India
[4] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, New Mehrauli Rd,JNU Ring Rd, New Delhi 110067, Delhi, India
[5] Natl Inst Med Stat, ICMR, New Delhi, India
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Inequality; Out-of-Pocket expenditure; Concentration index; Benefit incidence analysis (BIA); EQUITY; POOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101053
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The transition from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals 2030 has yet again emphasized on the unfinished agenda of achieving efficient and equitable health systems and universal health coverage. With trifling public spending on healthcare and insignificant insurance coverage, India has recorded 55 million people descending below the poverty line in one year due to healthcare payments. Not only are these health-related payments impoverishing but also the burden of seeking care is disproportionately skewed towards deprived population groups. Against this backdrop, the present paper examines the inequality in health status, utilization of health care services, and financial risk protection. The study is further complemented by assessing who benefits from public subsidies across different economic quintiles and as per epidemiological transition level (ETL) of states. Methods: This study used data nationwide National Sample Survey 75th round data. We perform the Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) using concentration indices, concentration curve, and poor-rich equity ratio to measure horizontal and vertical inequity and analyze the redistribution dimension to understand which population segment benefits more from public subsidies. Results: Findings suggest that high out of pocket (OOP) spending on inpatient care, especially in the private sector resulted in lower utilization of health care services especially among marginalized communities. Seeking care for marginalized sub-groups is dilapidating in two major ways-, on one hand, it exhausts all their income/savings for the treatment. On the other, as a result of incapacitation, families lose their daily income. The present analysis finds a higher unmet need for treatment in the poor, and the reasons commonly reported were pertaining to affordability, availability and accessibility. The results also showed that low ETL states faced a higher percentage of catastrophic expenditure vis-& agrave;-vis other states, thereby; stressing health system reforms beyond the "one-size-fits-all " strategy. Conclusions: It is imperative that both Central and State Governments should work together to strengthen the public healthcare system to ensure accessibility and quality of care. Central Government's Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY) health insurance program is a positive step forward to address the healthcare needs of deprived population subgroups.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06, India: Key Findings
  • [2] Appleton S., 1999, CHANGES POVERTY UGAN
  • [3] Equity in Health Care Financing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Studies Using Benefit and Financing Incidence Analyses
    Asante, Augustine
    Price, Jennifer
    Hayen, Andrew
    Jan, Stephen
    Wiseman, Virginia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04):
  • [4] Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels
    Bowser, Diana
    Patenaude, Bryan
    Bhawalkar, Manjiri
    Duran, Denizhan
    Berman, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [5] EQUITY AND EQUALITY IN HEALTH AND HEALTH-CARE
    CULYER, AJ
    WAGSTAFF, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1993, 12 (04) : 431 - 457
  • [6] Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study
    Dandona, Lalit
    Dandona, Rakhi
    Kumar, G. Anil
    Shukla, D. K.
    Paul, Vinod K.
    Balakrishnan, Kalpana
    Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
    Tandon, Nikhil
    Salvi, Sundeep
    Dash, A. P.
    Nandakumar, A.
    Patel, Vikram
    Agarwal, Sanjay K.
    Gupta, Prakash C.
    Dhaliwal, R. S.
    Mathur, Prashant
    Laxmaiah, Avula
    Dhillon, Preet K.
    Dey, Subhojit
    Mathur, Manu R.
    Afshin, Ashkan
    Fitzmaurice, Christina
    Gakidou, Emmanuela
    Gething, Peter
    Hay, Simon I.
    Kassebaum, Nicholas J.
    Kyu, Hmwe
    Lim, Stephen S.
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    Roth, Gregory A.
    Stanaway, Jeffrey D.
    Whiteford, Harvey
    Chadha, Vineet K.
    Khaparde, Sunil D.
    Rao, Raghuram
    Rade, Kirankumar
    Dewan, Puneet
    Furtado, Melissa
    Dutta, Eliza
    Varghese, Chris M.
    Mehrotra, Ravi
    Jambulingam, P.
    Kaur, Tanvir
    Sharma, Meenakshi
    Singh, Shalini
    Arora, Rashmi
    Rasaily, Reeta
    Anjana, Ranjit M.
    Mohan, Viswanathan
    Agrawal, Anurag
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 390 (10111) : 2437 - 2460
  • [7] Dilip T R, 2007, World Health Popul, V9, P98
  • [8] Findley PA, 2009, DEP EC DISCUSSION PA
  • [9] Ghatak Amrita., 2011, Burden of Income Loss due to Ailment in India: Evidence from NSS data
  • [10] Trends in health and health inequalities among major states of India: assessing progress through convergence models
    Goli, Srinivas
    Arokiasamy, Perianayagam
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2014, 9 (02) : 143 - 168