The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion

被引:49
作者
Treich, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, LERNA, Toulouse Sch Econ, F-31000 Toulouse, France
关键词
Ambiguity; Value of a statistical life; Uncertainty; Risk aversion; Willingness to pay; Benefit-cost analysis; Environmental risks; Health policy; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; EXPECTED UTILITY; RISK-AVERSION; UNCERTAINTY AVERSION; CHOICE; PROBABILITIES; REDUCTIONS; PROTECTION; PREFERENCE; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper shows that ambiguity aversion increases the value of a statistical life if the marginal utility of an increase in wealth is larger if one is alive rather than dead. Intuitively, ambiguity aversion has a similar effect as an increase in the perceived baseline mortality risk, and thus operates as the "dead anyway" effect. A numerical example suggests, however, that ambiguity aversion cannot justify the substantial "ambiguity premium" apparently embodied in environmental policy-making. The paper also shows that ambiguity aversion decreases the marginal cost of individual self-protection effort but may well decrease its marginal benefit, so that the total effect of ambiguity aversion on self-protection is unclear. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 26
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   The value of a statistical life in transport:: Findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden [J].
Persson, U ;
Norinder, A ;
Hjalte, K ;
Gralén, K .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 23 (02) :121-134
[42]   RISK-AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE [J].
PRATT, JW .
ECONOMETRICA, 1964, 32 (1-2) :122-136
[43]   Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth [J].
Pratt, JW ;
Zeckhauser, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (04) :747-763
[44]   A THEORY OF ANTICIPATED UTILITY [J].
QUIGGIN, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1982, 3 (04) :323-343
[45]   A theoretically-consistent empirical model of non-expected utility: An application to nuclear-waste transport [J].
Riddel, M ;
Shaw, WD .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2006, 32 (02) :131-150
[46]  
Ritov I., 1990, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V3, P263, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960030404
[47]   SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY AND EXPECTED UTILITY WITHOUT ADDITIVITY [J].
SCHMEIDLER, D .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (03) :571-587
[48]   THE ELLSBERG PARADOX AND RISK-AVERSION - AN ANTICIPATED UTILITY APPROACH [J].
SEGAL, U .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1987, 28 (01) :175-202
[49]   ENDOGENOUS RISK AND PROTECTION PREMIUMS [J].
SHOGREN, J .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1991, 31 (2-3) :241-256
[50]  
Shogren J. F., 2005, Acta Agricultura Scandinavica. Section C, Food Economics, V2, P117, DOI 10.1080/16507540500534754