Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: An evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator

被引:20
|
作者
van Vugt, Heidi A. [1 ,2 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. [1 ]
Joosten-van Zwanenburg, Evelien
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
Korfage, Ida J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Informed choice; Informed decision making; Prostate cancer; Prostate Risk Indicator; PSA test; Screening; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTIGEN; VALIDATION; KNOWLEDGE; MORTALITY; TRENDS; SCALE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. To help men making informed decisions about prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening a risk indicator (www.uroweb.org) was developed. This risk indicator is embedded in a leaflet that informs men about the pros and cons of PCa screening and enables calculation of the individual risk of having a biopsy detectable PCa. Aim: To assess the effect of providing a leaflet including individualized risk estimation on informed decision making of men, i.e. knowledge about PCa and PSA screening, attitude towards undergoing a PSA test and intention to have a PSA test. Methods: An intervention study among 2000 men, aged 55-65 years, randomly selected from the population registry of the city of Dordrecht, the Netherlands, in 2008. Men were sent a questionnaire on knowledge of PCa, attitude and intention to have a PSA test. Men without a history of (screening for) PCa were sent the leaflet and Questionnaire 2 within 2 weeks after returning Questionnaire 1. Validated health and anxiety measures were used. Results: One thousand and twenty seven of 2000 men completed Questionnaire 1 (51%), of whom 298 were excluded due to a history of (screening for) PCa. Of the 729 remaining men, 601 completed Questionnaire 2 as well. At the second assessment significantly more men met the requirements of informed decision making (15% versus 33%, p < 0.001), more men had relevant knowledge (284/601, 50% versus 420/601, 77%, p < 0.001) and the intention to have a PSA test had increased (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Providing information on PCa screening combined with individualized risk estimation enhanced informed decision making and may be used for shared decision making on PSA screening of physicians and patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supporting Informed Decision Making Online in 20 Minutes: An Observational Web-log Study of a PSA Test Decision Aid
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Evans, Rhodri
    Edwards, Adrian
    Newcombe, Robert G.
    Wright, Patricia
    Grol, Richard
    Elwyn, Glyn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (02)
  • [42] Diagnostic evaluation and incorporation of PSA density and the prostate imaging and data reporting system (PIRADS) version 2 classification in risk-nomograms for prostate cancer
    Rodriguez Cabello, Miguel Angel
    Mendez Rubio, Santiago
    Platas Sancho, Arturo
    Carballido Rodriguez, Joaquin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (10) : 2439 - 2450
  • [43] A Three-Gene Panel on Urine Increases PSA Specificity in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Rigau, Marina
    Ortega, Israel
    Carmen Mir, Maria
    Ballesteros, Carlos
    Garcia, Marta
    Llaurado, Marta
    Colas, Eva
    Pedrola, Nuria
    Montes, Melania
    Sequeiros, Tamara
    Ertekin, Tugce
    Majem, Blanca
    Planas, Jacques
    Ruiz, Anna
    Abal, Miguel
    Sanchez, Alex
    Morote, Juan
    Reventos, Jaume
    Doll, Andreas
    PROSTATE, 2011, 71 (16) : 1736 - 1745
  • [44] Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Rovner, David R.
    Scherer, Laura D.
    Whitfield, Jesse
    Kahn, Valerie C.
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (08) : 999 - 1009
  • [45] PSA testing: an evolving relationship with prostate cancer screening
    Constantinou, J
    Feneley, MR
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2006, 9 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [46] PSA testing: an evolving relationship with prostate cancer screening
    J Constantinou
    M R Feneley
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2006, 9 : 6 - 13
  • [47] Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography
    de Haan, Margriet C.
    de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R.
    Stoop, Esther
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Fockens, Paul
    Thomeer, Maarten
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Stoker, Jaap
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 91 (03) : 318 - 325
  • [48] Is Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Restrained by Evidence-Based Medicine?
    Irani, Jacques
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (11) : 782 - 787
  • [49] Detection of prostate cancer in 2007 -: Part 1:: PSA and PSA kinetics
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Wolters, Tineke
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Gosselaar, Claartje
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (03) : 468 - 477
  • [50] Number of screens for overdetection as an indicator of absolute risk of overdiagnosis in prostate cancer screening
    Wu, Grace Hui-Min
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Maattanen, Liisa
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    Hakama, Matti
    Yen, Amy Ming-Fang
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (06) : 1367 - 1375