Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: An evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator

被引:20
|
作者
van Vugt, Heidi A. [1 ,2 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. [1 ]
Joosten-van Zwanenburg, Evelien
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
Korfage, Ida J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Informed choice; Informed decision making; Prostate cancer; Prostate Risk Indicator; PSA test; Screening; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTIGEN; VALIDATION; KNOWLEDGE; MORTALITY; TRENDS; SCALE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. To help men making informed decisions about prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening a risk indicator (www.uroweb.org) was developed. This risk indicator is embedded in a leaflet that informs men about the pros and cons of PCa screening and enables calculation of the individual risk of having a biopsy detectable PCa. Aim: To assess the effect of providing a leaflet including individualized risk estimation on informed decision making of men, i.e. knowledge about PCa and PSA screening, attitude towards undergoing a PSA test and intention to have a PSA test. Methods: An intervention study among 2000 men, aged 55-65 years, randomly selected from the population registry of the city of Dordrecht, the Netherlands, in 2008. Men were sent a questionnaire on knowledge of PCa, attitude and intention to have a PSA test. Men without a history of (screening for) PCa were sent the leaflet and Questionnaire 2 within 2 weeks after returning Questionnaire 1. Validated health and anxiety measures were used. Results: One thousand and twenty seven of 2000 men completed Questionnaire 1 (51%), of whom 298 were excluded due to a history of (screening for) PCa. Of the 729 remaining men, 601 completed Questionnaire 2 as well. At the second assessment significantly more men met the requirements of informed decision making (15% versus 33%, p < 0.001), more men had relevant knowledge (284/601, 50% versus 420/601, 77%, p < 0.001) and the intention to have a PSA test had increased (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Providing information on PCa screening combined with individualized risk estimation enhanced informed decision making and may be used for shared decision making on PSA screening of physicians and patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does PSA testing influence the natural history of prostate cancer?
    Anderson, J
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2002, 1 (05) : 3 - 10
  • [32] Prostate Cancer Survivors as Community Health Educators: Implications for Informed Decision Making and Cancer Communication
    Vijaykumar, Santosh
    Wray, Ricardo J.
    Jupka, Keri
    Clarke, Ryan
    Shahid, Mellve
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2013, 28 (04) : 623 - 628
  • [33] A Web-Based Decision Aid for Informed Prostate Cancer Screening: Development and Pilot Evaluation
    Jung, Wonyoung
    Cho, In Young
    Jeon, Keun Hye
    Yeo, Yohwan
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Suh, Mina
    Jeong, Ansuk
    Lee, Jungkwon
    Shin, Dong Wook
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (46)
  • [34] Combining SERS analysis of serum with PSA levels for improving the detection of prostate cancer
    Stefancu, Andrei
    Moisoiu, Vlad
    Couti, Razvan
    Andras, Iulia
    Rahota, Razvan
    Crisan, Dana
    Pavel, Ioana E.
    Socaciu, Carmen
    Leopold, Nicolae
    Crisan, Nicolae
    NANOMEDICINE, 2018, 13 (19) : 2455 - 2467
  • [35] The decision-making process in prostate cancer screening in primary care with a prostate-specific antigen: A systematic review
    Vedel, Isabelle
    Puts, Martine T. E.
    Monette, Michele
    Monette, Johanne
    Bergman, Howard
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03) : 161 - 176
  • [36] Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Basin, Michael F.
    Crane, Kelly
    Basnet, Alina
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Shapiro, Oleg
    Jacob, Joseph M.
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Goldberg, Hanan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (06): : 1008 - 1015
  • [37] Prostate Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making for Screening and Treatment
    Blackwelder, Russ
    Chessman, Alexander
    PRIMARY CARE, 2019, 46 (01): : 149 - +
  • [38] Physicians' Attitudes About Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening
    Davis, Kimberly
    Haisfield, Lisa
    Dorfman, Caroline
    Krist, Alex
    Taylor, Kathryn L.
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (04) : 260 - 266
  • [39] Digital Solutions for Informed Decision Making: An Academic-Community Partnership for the Development of a Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for African American Men
    Owens, Otis L.
    Friedman, Daniela B.
    Brandt, Heather M.
    Bernhardt, Jay M.
    Hebert, James R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2016, 10 (03) : 207 - 219
  • [40] Prostate Cancer Ambassadors: Process and Outcomes of a Prostate Cancer Informed Decision-Making Training Program
    Vines, Anissa I.
    Hunter, Jaimie C.
    Carlisle, Veronica A.
    Richmond, Alan N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2017, 11 (01) : 54 - 62