Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: An evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator

被引:20
|
作者
van Vugt, Heidi A. [1 ,2 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Venderbos, Lionne D. F. [1 ]
Joosten-van Zwanenburg, Evelien
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
Korfage, Ida J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Informed choice; Informed decision making; Prostate cancer; Prostate Risk Indicator; PSA test; Screening; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTIGEN; VALIDATION; KNOWLEDGE; MORTALITY; TRENDS; SCALE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. To help men making informed decisions about prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening a risk indicator (www.uroweb.org) was developed. This risk indicator is embedded in a leaflet that informs men about the pros and cons of PCa screening and enables calculation of the individual risk of having a biopsy detectable PCa. Aim: To assess the effect of providing a leaflet including individualized risk estimation on informed decision making of men, i.e. knowledge about PCa and PSA screening, attitude towards undergoing a PSA test and intention to have a PSA test. Methods: An intervention study among 2000 men, aged 55-65 years, randomly selected from the population registry of the city of Dordrecht, the Netherlands, in 2008. Men were sent a questionnaire on knowledge of PCa, attitude and intention to have a PSA test. Men without a history of (screening for) PCa were sent the leaflet and Questionnaire 2 within 2 weeks after returning Questionnaire 1. Validated health and anxiety measures were used. Results: One thousand and twenty seven of 2000 men completed Questionnaire 1 (51%), of whom 298 were excluded due to a history of (screening for) PCa. Of the 729 remaining men, 601 completed Questionnaire 2 as well. At the second assessment significantly more men met the requirements of informed decision making (15% versus 33%, p < 0.001), more men had relevant knowledge (284/601, 50% versus 420/601, 77%, p < 0.001) and the intention to have a PSA test had increased (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Providing information on PCa screening combined with individualized risk estimation enhanced informed decision making and may be used for shared decision making on PSA screening of physicians and patients. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 677
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Church-Based Intervention to Promote Informed Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among African American Men
    Drake, Bettina F.
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    Gilligan, Timothy
    Allen, Jennifer D.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 102 (03) : 164 - 171
  • [22] Addressing the Challenge of Informed Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Community Outreach to African American Men
    Wray, Ricardo J.
    Vijaykumar, Santosh
    Jupka, Keri
    Zellin, Stacie
    Shahid, Mellve
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2011, 5 (06) : 508 - 516
  • [23] Beyond PSA testing for prostate cancer
    Brooks, Doug
    Olver, Ian N.
    Esterman, Adrian J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2018, 208 (10) : 424 - 426
  • [24] Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening
    Knight, Sara J.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (02) : 257 - +
  • [25] Prostate Cancer Ambassadors: Enhancing a Theory-Informed Training Program for Informed Decision-Making
    Anissa I. Vines
    Jaimie C. Hunter
    Veronica A. Carlisle
    Alan N. Richmond
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 454 - 459
  • [26] Prostate Cancer Ambassadors: Enhancing a Theory-Informed Training Program for Informed Decision-Making
    Vines, Anissa I.
    Hunter, Jaimie C.
    Carlisle, Veronica A.
    Richmond, Alan N.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2017, 32 (03) : 454 - 459
  • [27] Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested
    Watson, Eila
    Hewitson, Paul
    Brett, Joanne
    Bukach, Colleen
    Evans, Rhodri
    Edwards, Adrian
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Cargill, Anna
    Austoker, Joan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) : 367 - 379
  • [28] Navigation-Based Telehealth Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men
    Ba, Djibril M.
    Kayembe, Chrispin
    Littlejohn, Joe
    Van Scoy, Lauren J.
    Vandyke, Erika
    Williams, James
    Katoch, Avnish
    Shook, Neil C.
    Zhang, Yue
    Livelsberger, Craig
    Mcdonald, Alicia C.
    Muscat, Joshua E.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 3698 - 3712
  • [29] Prostate Cancer Survivors as Community Health Educators: Implications for Informed Decision Making and Cancer Communication
    Santosh Vijaykumar
    Ricardo J. Wray
    Keri Jupka
    Ryan Clarke
    Mellve Shahid
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2013, 28 : 623 - 628
  • [30] Incorporating PHI in decision making: external validation of the Rotterdam risk calculators for detection of prostate cancer
    Rius Bilbao, Leire
    Larracoechea, Urko Aguirre
    Gomez, Carmen Valladares
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Medina, Carmen Mar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)