An analysis of health and safety provisions in NEC contracts

被引:1
作者
Ndekugri, Issaka [1 ]
Ankrah, Nii A. [2 ]
Adaku, Ebenezer [1 ]
Mzyece, Dingayo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Wolverhampton, England
[2] Aston Univ, Coll Engn & Phys Sci, Dept Civil Engn, Quant Surveying, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Coventry Univ, Sch Energy Construct & Environm, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
contracts & law; project management; safety; LONDON; 2012; CONSTRUCTION; DESIGN; REGULATIONS;
D O I
10.1680/jmapl.21.00021
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The 2015 edition of the Construction (Design and Management) (CDM) Regulations imposes statutory duties on the project client and other project supply chain members. It is the client's statutory duty to make and implement arrangements for effective management of health and safety (H&S) on the project. It also created two statutory duty holders that the client must appoint to coordinate H&S management. To manage the performance of the duty holders effectively, the client must enter into a contract with each of them that imposes their statutory duties as contractual obligations. This paper critically analyses two representative contracts in the NEC family of contracts to provide guidance on their H&S provisions and pointers to possible review in future editions. An important finding is that the contracts state the H&S duties in very general terms with the expectation that users will draft the details on the CDM duties as part of the scope contract document. This approach has the advantage of flexibility to accommodate international use of the contracts. It is recommended that the promoters consider the alternative of capturing appropriate CDM-related duties as a standard optional clause for adoption by UK users. Suggestions are made as to the terms in such an optional clause.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 75
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Managing Health and Safety in Construction Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INVESTORS COMPENSATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1868, Rylands v Fletcher
[4]  
[Anonymous], Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, REV HLTH SAF STRAT S
[6]  
Baxendale T., 2000, International Journal of Project Management, V18, P33, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00066-0
[7]   CDM regulations: 12 years of pain but little gain [J].
Beal, Alasdair N. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, 160 (02) :82-88
[8]  
Bolt H., 2012, RR955 UK HLTH SAF EX
[9]  
Bomel Ltd, 2007, IMPROVING EFFECTIVEN
[10]   Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? [J].
Briscoe, G ;
Dainty, A .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2005, 10 (3-4) :319-326