The production of achievement inequality in high school English

被引:61
作者
Carbonaro, WJ
Gamoran, A
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
instruction; reading; tracking;
D O I
10.3102/00028312039004801
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Does unequal access to high quality English instruction lead to unequal achievement outcomes for students? Four key aspects of high quality instruction-quantity of assignments, coherence of instruction, student voice in curricular and pedagogical issues, and the content of instruction-are examined to see whether each aspect affects growth in reading achievement from grades 8 to 12. Analyses indicate that some aspects of student voice enhance achievement growth, but quantity and coherence do not. Content has the most substantial impact on achievement growth: greater emphasis on analytical writing is associated with greater growth in reading scores. Overall, these measures of instructional practices partially explain why students' track position and reading achievement are related.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 827
页数:27
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING GAP OUR SCH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, READING WRITING CONN
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAEP 1998 WRITING RE
[4]  
Applebee A.N., 1996, CURRICULUM CONVERSAT
[5]  
Barr R., 1983, SCH WORK
[6]  
Bernstein BasilB., 1971, CLASS CODES CONTROL
[7]  
Berry W.D., 1985, Multiple regression in practice, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412985208
[8]  
BERRYMAN SE, 1992, DOUBLE HELIX ED EC
[9]  
Bourdieu P., 2000, REPROD ED SOC CULTUR
[10]  
Brophy J., 1986, HDB RES TEACHING, V3rd