A network-based model of exploration and exploitation

被引:7
作者
den Hamer, Pieter [1 ,2 ]
Frenken, Koen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Complex Syst Studies CCSS, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Gartner, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Complexity; NK-model; Proximity; Small-world; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; SMALL WORLDS; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; AMBIDEXTERITY; DISTANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; EMBEDDEDNESS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.040
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose a new model of exploration and exploitation, in which firms rely on local search for exploitation and on imitation for exploration. We assume that firms imitate the knowledge base of successful competitors, with imitation errors taking place depending on the social distance between the imitating firm and imitated firm in the network. The key model outcome, consistent with earlier empirical findings, holds that successful imitation generally occurs at an intermediate level of cognitive proximity because imitation at high cognitive distance is too error-prone, while for imitation at low cognitive distance there are typically no firms to imitate. A second outcome holds that social and cognitive proximity are substitutes. The model further shows that exploration by imitation is more beneficial in highly complex industries than in less complex industries, and that small-world networks yield the highest benefits for collective learning.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 599
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[2]   Effective Search in Rugged Performance Landscapes: A Review and Outlook [J].
Baumann, Oliver ;
Schmidt, Jens ;
Stieglitz, Nils .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (01) :285-318
[3]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[4]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[5]   Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries [J].
Bouty, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (01) :50-65
[6]   Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows [J].
Breschi, Stefano ;
Lissoni, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 9 (04) :439-468
[7]   Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability [J].
Capaldo, Antonio .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (06) :585-608
[8]   Research Collaboration in Co-inventor Networks: Combining Closure, Bridging and Proximities [J].
Cassi, Lorenzo ;
Plunket, Anne .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (06) :936-954
[9]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[10]   Knowledge dynamics in a network industry [J].
Cowan, R ;
Jonard, N ;
Özman, M .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2004, 71 (05) :469-484