Effects of formative and production pruning on fig growth, phenology, and production

被引:0
|
作者
Araujo da Silva, Debora Macedo [1 ]
da Silva Santos, Natanael Pereira [1 ]
Araujo Santos, Ennus E. de Sousa [1 ]
Pereira, Gustavo Alves [1 ]
da Silva Junior, Gabriel Barbosa [2 ]
da Cunha, Jenilton Gomes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Piaui, Dept Agron, BR 135,Km 3 Planalto Horizonte, BR-64900000 Bom Jesus, PI, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Piaui, Dept Fitotecnia, Campus Univ SOCOPO S-N, BR-64049550 Teresina, PI, Brazil
关键词
Ficus carica L; formative pruning; production pruning; phenological stages; GLMM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Tree pruning influences the phenology of fruit species. The present study aimed to evaluate the growth and phenology of the fig cultivar 'Roxo de Valinhos' subjected to formative and production pruning in the semi-arid region of Piaui. A phenological analysis was performed after formative pruning in 27 fig plants based on the following periods: from formative pruning to the beginning of sprouting, at the beginning of harvest and at its end, and during harvest. Additionally, the variables of branch length, branch diameter, number of leaves, nodes, shoots, inflorescences, and secondary branches were also evaluated. The production pruning treatments (10, 20, and 30 cm) had nine replications each. The Generalized Linear Mixed Model used assumed as fixed factors the branch sizes at pruning (10, 20, and 30 cm), time after pruning (30, 60, 90, and 120 days), and the interaction between factors. The results revealed that figs were well adapted to the semi-arid region of Piaui and showed precocity at all phenological stages compared to those grown in temperate regions. With regard to production pruning, branch size as a function of time did not influence fig development.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 24
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BIOREGULATORS FOR FIG PRODUCTION UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS
    Soberanes-Perez, Alba
    Calderon-Zavala, Guillermo
    Lopez-Jimenez, Alfredo
    Alvarado-Raya, Horacio E.
    REVISTA FITOTECNIA MEXICANA, 2020, 43 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [32] Mulching impact on plant growth and production of rainfed fig orchards under drought conditions
    Jafari, Moslem
    Haghighi, Jalil Abdolahi Pour
    Zare, Hamid
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (01): : 428 - 433
  • [33] THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF SPUR PRUNING UPON THE PRODUCTION AND GROWTH OF MUSCADINE GRAPES
    LOOMIS, NH
    MURPHY, MM
    COWART, FF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1949, 54 (DEC): : 183 - 185
  • [34] Production and Distribution Theories, the Formative Period
    Roll, Eric
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1941, 31 (04): : 855 - 857
  • [35] Production and Distribution Theories: The Formative Period
    Dorfman, Joseph
    POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1942, 57 (03) : 468 - 468
  • [36] Maintenance pruning in physalis commercial production
    de Oliveira D'angelo, Jessica Welinski
    Bastos, Marilia Camotti
    Cuquel, Francine Lorena
    BRAGANTIA, 2017, 76 (02) : 214 - 219
  • [37] Fig tree phenology, thermal sum, and productivity in intensive pruning system in two crop cycles in the semiarid region of Piaui
    Evangelista, T. Y. L.
    Carvalho Miranda, A.
    Campelo Monte Junior, F. A.
    Sousa Cavalcante, E.
    Aguiar, C. D.
    Alves Pereira, G.
    Barbosa da Silva Junior, G.
    FRUITS, 2021, 76 (05) : 223 - 229
  • [38] Flower production and phenology in Dactylis glomerata
    Tormo-Molina, Rafael
    Maya-Manzano, Jose-Maria
    Silva-Palacios, Inmaculada
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, Santiago
    Gonzalo-Garijo, Angela
    AEROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 31 (04) : 469 - 479
  • [39] Phenology of flowering and nut production in macadamia
    Boyton, SJ
    Hardner, CM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL FRUITS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2002, (575): : 381 - 387
  • [40] Phenology, production and quality of blueberry cultivars
    Correa Antunes, Luis Eduardo
    Goncalves, Emerson Dias
    Ristow, Nara Cristina
    Carpenedo, Silvia
    Trevisan, Renato
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2008, 43 (08) : 1011 - 1015