Evaluating children's services: Recent conceptual and methodological developments

被引:29
作者
Axford, N
Little, M
Morpeth, L
Weyts, A
机构
[1] Dartington Social Res Unit, Dartington TQ9 6EQ, Totnes, England
[2] Univ Chicago, Chapin Hall Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
evaluation; children's services; experimental methods; non-experimental methods;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bch163
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article considers recent innovations and challenges with respect to the evaluation of children's services interventions. It sets out a method for designing and evaluating services that is based on research evidence gathered on individual cases and that permits revision of those services in the light of emerging results. It starts by describing briefly different ways of identifying a discrete group of children with similar needs. It then outlines approaches to ensuring that an intervention for those children is underpinned by theory and research evidence-including the idea of 'logic modelling' before discussing the importance of capturing accurately how well the intervention is implemented. Experimental and non-experimental methods of assessing an intervention's effectiveness are considered, with particular emphasis on techniques for enhancing the causal inference that can be drawn from studies and the importance of matching method and purpose. The article also demonstrates how the principles and methods used in relation to evaluating services for groups can be applied in clinical work with individual cases, and identifies the benefits of this general approach to evaluation over and above the information that it provides on what works.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 88
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ANDERSONMOORE K, 2002, BUILDING BETTER TEEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHAT WORKS EARLY YEA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, What works with children and adolescents? A critical review of psychological interventions with children, adolescents and their families
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CHILD PROT MESS RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CHILD PROTECTION PRA
[6]  
AXFORD N, 2003, EVALUATING GOOD PRAC
[7]  
BENNETT T, 1991, BRIT J CRIMINOL, V31, P1
[8]  
BIERMAN KL, 1996, UNDERSTANDING AGGRES
[9]  
Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215
[10]  
*CAN TASKF PER HLT, 1979, CANADIAN MED ASS J, V121, P1139