Correlation between saturation pressures and dimensions of nanoparticles. Are the fundamental equations really fair?

被引:8
作者
Dobruskin, VK
机构
[1] Beer-Yacov 70300
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la0267490
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The relationships between the geometric form and saturation pressure are derived on the basis of thermodynamics and molecular models. A comparison of the relationships with the classical Laplace and Kelvin equations shows that there is a profound conceptual diversity between approaches: the classical equations contain the surface tension, gamma, as a parameter, whereas developed equations include the difference of the potential energies of a nanoparticle and a semi-infinite planar body with respect to the gas phase, which is equal to the difference of energies of autoadsorption on surfaces of bodies. The latter circumstance affords ground for calculating the change of interest proceeding from well-developed methods of adsorption theory. Molecular models are discussed for simple spherical bodies and applied to the processes of nucleation and growth of drops. In the cases of (i) water and mercury drops or capillaries with diameters of approximate to1 mum and (ii) cyclohexane meniscuses on mica cylinders, the classical and new relations predict close results, which are in agreement with experiments; nevertheless, for organic substances, especially at elevated temperatures, noticeable deviations must be expected. The divergence of the approaches makes its appearance in the case of condensation in narrow capillaries with radii approximate to1 - 10 nm when the new equation provides a correct description of experimental facts whereas the Kelvin model predicts unrealistic effects. Considering the growth of surface areas due to the extension or adsorption shows that gamma does not take into account all changes associated with alterations of surface areas, and it is this fact that underlies the probable defect in the classical equations.
引用
收藏
页码:4004 / 4013
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ADAMSON AW, 1997, PHYSICAL CHEM SURFAC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INTERMOLECULAR SURFA
[3]   Development of a picture of the van der Waals interaction energy between clusters of nanometer-range particles [J].
Arunachalam, V ;
Marlow, WH ;
Lu, JX .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1998, 58 (03) :3451-3457
[4]  
ATKINS PW, 1980, PHYSICAL CHEM
[5]  
Avgul N.N., 1975, ADSORPTION GASES VAP
[6]  
BENSON GC, 1967, SOLID GAS INTERFACE, V1, P203
[7]   Van der Waals attraction between spherical particles [J].
Chen, J ;
Anandarajah, A .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1996, 180 (02) :519-523
[8]  
COLEBURN NL, 1972, J COLLOID INTERF SCI, V38, P84, DOI 10.1016/0021-9797(72)90222-6
[9]   APPROXIMATE METHOD OF EVALUATING LATTICE SUMS OF R-N FOR GRAPHITE [J].
CROWELL, AD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1954, 22 (08) :1397-1399
[10]   Correlation between volume and surface adsorption. Adsorption on nanoparticles [J].
Dobruskin, VK .
LANGMUIR, 2003, 19 (06) :2134-2146