Relating Anomaly Correlation to Lead Time: Principal Component Analysis of NMME Forecasts of Summer Precipitation in China

被引:7
作者
Zhao, Tongtiegang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Liu, Pan [2 ]
Zhang, Yongyong [4 ]
Liu, Bingjun [1 ]
Lin, Kairong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
global climate model; seasonal forecasts; precipitation; anomaly correlation; spatial and temporal variation; STREAMFLOW FORECASTS; GLOBAL PRECIPITATION; PREDICTION SYSTEM; CLIMATE MODEL; RESOLUTION; RAINFALL; MONSOON; SKILL; CFSV2; PREDICTABILITY;
D O I
10.1029/2018JD028267
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The skill of global climate model (GCM) forecasts is usually indicated by the anomaly correlation between ensemble mean and observation. For GCM forecasts, anomaly correlation does not steadily improve with decreasing lead time but oscillates instead. This paper aims to address the oscillation and illustrate the relationship between anomaly correlation and lead time. We formulate the anomaly correlation of forecasts at different initialization times as a vector and pool anomaly correlation vectors across grid cells in the analysis. We propose two patterns to characterize the spatial and temporal variation of anomaly correlation in the three-dimensional space of latitude, longitude, and initialization time. The first pattern suggests that the anomaly correlation at different initialization times is at a similar level. The second pattern indicates that the anomaly correlation linearly increases with decreasing lead time. These two patterns are tested using the eigenvectors through principal component analysis. They are first illustrated using the GFDL-CM2p1-aer04 forecasts of summer precipitation in China. They are further verified by another nine sets of North-American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) forecasts. Overall, the first pattern explains more variation than the second pattern. In total, the two patterns explain 42% of the variation of anomaly correlation for CanCM3, 59% for CanCM4, 42% for COLA-RSMAS-CCSM3), 45% for COLA-RSMAS-CCSM4, 59% for GFDL-CM2p1, 67% for GFDL-CM2p1-aer04, 65% for GFDL-CM2p5-FLOR-A06, 57% for GFDL-CM2p5-FLOR-B01, 48% for NCAR-CESM1, and 60% for NCEP-CFSv2. The percentage of explained variation demonstrates the effectiveness of the two patterns as exploratory tools to analyze the predictive performance of GCM forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:6039 / 6052
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   GloFAS - global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning [J].
Alfieri, L. ;
Burek, P. ;
Dutra, E. ;
Krzeminski, B. ;
Muraro, D. ;
Thielen, J. ;
Pappenberger, F. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (03) :1161-1175
[2]   Does the NMME Capture a Recent Decadal Shift toward Increasing Drought Occurrence in the Southwestern United States? [J].
Barnston, Anthony G. ;
Lyon, Bradfield .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (02) :561-581
[3]   The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction [J].
Bauer, Peter ;
Thorpe, Alan ;
Brunet, Gilbert .
NATURE, 2015, 525 (7567) :47-55
[4]   Predictability and Forecast Skill in NMME [J].
Becker, Emily ;
van den Dool, Hijug ;
Zhang, Qin .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (15) :5891-5906
[5]   Reliable long-range ensemble streamflow forecasts: Combining calibrated climate forecasts with a conceptual runoff model and a staged error model [J].
Bennett, James C. ;
Wang, Q. J. ;
Li, Ming ;
Robertson, David E. ;
Schepen, Andrew .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (10) :8238-8259
[6]   A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems [J].
Buizza, R ;
Houtekamer, PL ;
Toth, Z ;
Pellerin, G ;
Wei, MZ ;
Zhu, YJ .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) :1076-1097
[7]   Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflow [J].
Chiew, FHS ;
McMahon, TA .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (06) :1235-1245
[8]   Bias correcting precipitation forecasts to improve the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts [J].
Crochemore, Louise ;
Ramos, Maria-Helena ;
Pappenberger, Florian .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (09) :3601-3618
[9]   The Science of NOAA's Operational Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast Service [J].
Demargne, Julie ;
Wu, Limin ;
Regonda, Satish K. ;
Brown, James D. ;
Lee, Haksu ;
He, Minxue ;
Seo, Dong-Jun ;
Hartman, Robert ;
Herr, Henry D. ;
Fresch, Mark ;
Schaake, John ;
Zhu, Yuejian .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 95 (01) :79-98
[10]   Principal Component Analysis on Spatial Data: An Overview [J].
Demsar, Urska ;
Harris, Paul ;
Brunsdon, Chris ;
Fotheringham, A. Stewart ;
McLoone, Sean .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2013, 103 (01) :106-128