Dynamic Patterns of Knowledge Capabilities: A Comparative Analysis among OECD and G20

被引:0
作者
Kim, KeunHwan [1 ]
Shim, We [2 ]
Moon, YoungHo [3 ]
Heo, YoSeob [3 ]
Kang, JongSeok [3 ]
机构
[1] KISTI, Dept Enterprises Innovat Strategy, Seoul, South Korea
[2] BISTEP, Dept Strategy Planning, Busan, South Korea
[3] KISTI, Dept Scientomet, Seoul, South Korea
来源
2018 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET '18): MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THE ENGINE FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH | 2018年
关键词
TRIPLE-HELIX INDICATORS; TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This article made a fresh attempt to deduce a consensus on definition of knowledge per se and valid measurements for it, thereby providing better understanding the advanced knowledge-based economy. By reviewing literatures, we identified the conceptual approach to the phenomenon of technology convergence was identical to that of knowledge evolution. With two - persistence and diversity - dimensions, the dynamic patterns of knowledge utilization of OECD and G20 nations are explained during 1991-2015. The results indicate the existence of four knowledge groups characterized by markedly different degrees of development from the technology perspective. Most highly industrialized nations such as Untied States, Germany, and Korea have maintained their knowledge utilization capabilities in high levels. On the contrary, developing countries such as Indonesia, Mexico, and Czech Republic have struggled to develop the depth of knowledge. The value of suggested indicators for knowledge utilization capabilities for guiding public policy and cooperative strategy finally discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SCI TECHN IND SCOR K
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, LEARNING TECHNOLOGIC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-based Assets
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, DOI [10.1007/BF01236366, DOI 10.1007/BF01236366]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KNOWL BAS EC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level: Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitilised Economy
[7]   Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice [J].
Archibugi, D ;
Coco, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (02) :175-194
[8]   A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo) [J].
Archibugi, D ;
Coco, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (04) :629-654
[9]   The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators [J].
Archibugi, Daniele ;
Denni, Mario ;
Filippetti, Andrea .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2009, 76 (07) :917-931
[10]   An international comparison of sectoral knowledge bases: persistence and integration in the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Brusoni, S ;
Geuna, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (10) :1897-1912