Life satisfaction, QALYs, and the monetary value of health

被引:54
作者
Huang, Li [1 ]
Frijters, Paul [2 ]
Dalziel, Kim [1 ]
Clarke, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Policy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] London Sch Econ, Ctr Econ Performance, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; Wellbeing; Life satisfaction; QALY; Value of health; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; VALUATION; HAPPINESS; UTILITY; PREFERENCE; DECISION; INCOME; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The monetary value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is frequently used to assess the benefits of health interventions and inform funding decisions. However, there is little consensus on methods for the estimation of this monetary value. In this study, we use life satisfaction as an indicator of 'experienced utility', and estimate the dollar equivalent value of a QALY using a fixed effect model with instrumental variable estimators. Using a nationally-representative longitudinal survey including 28,347 individuals followed during 2002-2015 in Australia, we estimate that individual's willingness to pay for one QALY is approximately A$42,000-A$67,000, and the willingness to pay for not having a long-term condition approximately A$2000 per year. As the estimates are derived using population-level data and a wellbeing measurement of life satisfaction, the approach has the advantage of being socially inclusive and recognizes the significant meaning of people's subjective valuations of health. The method could be particularly useful for nations where QALY thresholds are not yet validated or established.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HILDA User Manual-Release 15
[2]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2015, 6523 0 HOUS INC WEAL
[3]   Influenza-Like-Illness and Clinically Diagnosed Flu: Disease Burden, Costs and Quality of Life for Patients Seeking Ambulatory Care or No Professional Care at All [J].
Bilcke, Joke ;
Coenen, Samuel ;
Beutels, Philippe .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07)
[4]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[5]   A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness [J].
Clark, AE ;
Oswald, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (06) :1139-1144
[6]   Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Frijters, Paul ;
Shields, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) :95-144
[7]   CAUSES FOR CONCERN: IS NICE FAILING TO UPHOLD ITS RESPONSIBILITIES TO ALL NHS PATIENTS? [J].
Claxton, Karl ;
Sculpher, Mark ;
Palmer, Stephen ;
Culyer, Anthony J. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 24 (01) :1-7
[8]   Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health [J].
Dolan, Paul ;
Kahneman, Daniel .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2008, 118 (525) :215-234
[9]   Quality of Life and Cost-effectiveness of a 3-Year Trial of Lifestyle Intervention in Primary Health Care [J].
Eriksson, Margareta K. ;
Hagberg, Lars ;
Lindholm, Lars ;
Malmgren-Olsson, Eva-Britt ;
Osterlind, Jonas ;
Eliasson, Mats .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (16) :1470-1479
[10]   The subjective costs of health losses due to chronic diseases. An alternative model for monetary appraisal [J].
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A ;
van Praag, BMS .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (08) :709-722