Contact force facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation

被引:11
作者
Schaeffer, Benjamin [1 ]
Willems, Stephan [1 ]
Meyer, Christian [1 ]
Lueker, Jakob [2 ]
Akbulak, Ruken O. [1 ]
Moser, Julia [1 ]
Jularic, Mario [1 ]
Eickholt, Christian [1 ]
Schwarzl, Jana M. [1 ]
Gunawardene, Melanie [1 ]
Kuklik, Pawel [1 ]
Sultan, Arian [2 ]
Hoffmann, Boris A. [3 ]
Steven, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg, Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Mainz, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Mainz, Germany
关键词
Ablation; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Contact force; Unexcitability; LEFT ATRIAL ABLATION; CATHETER ABLATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; PACE CAPTURE; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; FIBRILLATION; RECONNECTION; SYSTEM; PREDICTION; CONDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-018-1228-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Contact force (CF) catheters provide catheter-tissue contact information to improve outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We evaluated different target-CF values for achievement of the additional endpoint of an unexcitable ablation line. Methods A total of 106 patients undergoing PVI were randomized into three groups (G) (G1: target-CF 15 g, G2: target-CF 10 g, G3: CF concealed from operator). The PVI encircling line was divided into predefined sections. Excitable tissue along the PVI-line identified by high output pacing (10 V, 2 ms) was targeted for further ablation. Results Mean average CF was 17.4 +/- 4.7 g (G1) vs. 12.3 +/- 6.0 g (G2) vs. 11.1 +/- 6.5 g (G 3) (p < 0.001). Primary unexcitable ablation lines were found in 38.6, 19.4 and 5.7% (G1, G2, G3 respectively; G1 vs. G2 p < 0.05, G1 vs. G3 p < 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns). Additional radiofrequency (RF)-energy to achieve unexcitability was lowest in G1 (3.6 +/- 3.1 kJ vs. 8.6 +/- 7.2 kJ (G2) and 10.4 +/- 6.7 (G3), p <= 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns) with accordingly lowest additional RF applications in G1 (3.0 +/- 2.6 vs. 7.0 +/- 5.4 in G2 and 8.4 +/- 4.0 in G3; G1 vs. G2 and G3, p < 0.001, G 2 vs. G 3 ns). Sections along ablation lines with low initial CF were most likely to reveal excitability. Single procedure success was 81.9 vs. 73.5 vs. 71.4% (G 1, 2 and 3, p = 0.6) during 437 +/- 254 day follow-up. Conclusion Higher tip-to-tissue CF during PVI facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line, requiring less additional RF-energy.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 641
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation: a comparative analysis between cryogenic and contact force radiofrequency ablation
    Aditi S. Vaishnav
    Evan Levine
    Kristie M. Coleman
    Stuart J. Beldner
    Jason S. Chinitz
    Kabir Bhasin
    Neil E. Bernstein
    Nicholas T. Skipitaris
    Stavros E. Mountantonakis
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2020, 57 : 67 - 75
  • [32] Early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation: a comparative analysis between cryogenic and contact force radiofrequency ablation
    Vaishnav, Aditi S.
    Levine, Evan
    Coleman, Kristie M.
    Beldner, Stuart J.
    Chinitz, Jason S.
    Bhasin, Kabir
    Bernstein, Neil E.
    Skipitaris, Nicholas T.
    Mountantonakis, Stavros E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [33] Less Pulmonary Vein Reconnection at Redo Procedures Following Radiofrequency Point-by-Point Antral Pulmonary Vein Isolation With the Use of Contemporary Catheter Ablation Technologies
    Sandorfi, Gabor
    Rodriguez-Manero, Moises
    Saenen, Johan
    Baluja, Aurora
    Bories, Wim
    Huybrechts, Wim
    Miljoen, Hielko
    Vandaele, Lien
    Heidbuchel, Hein
    Sarkozy, Andrea
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (12) : 1556 - 1565
  • [34] Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Ablation Index via Single Transseptal Crossing: Critical Role of Carina Isolation
    Rosso, Raphael
    Chorin, Ehud
    Schwartz, Arie Lorin
    Levi, Yuval
    Hochstadt, Aviram
    Viskin, Sami
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (09) : 1373 - 1378
  • [35] Contact-force guided single-catheter approach for pulmonary vein isolation: Feasibility, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness
    Pambrun, Thomas
    Combes, Stephane
    Sousa, Pedro
    Le Bloa, Mathieu
    El Bouazzaoui, Rim
    Grand-Larrieu, Delphine
    Thompson, Nathaniel
    Martin, Ruairidh
    Combes, Nicolas
    Boveda, Serge
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    Albenque, Jean-Paul
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (03) : 331 - 338
  • [36] Achievement of pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: A randomized comparison between two different isolation approaches
    Liu, Xingpeng
    Dong, Jianzeng
    Mavrakis, Hercules E.
    Hu, Fuli
    Long, Deyong
    Fang, Dongping
    Yu, Ronghui
    Tang, Ribo
    Hao, Peng
    Lu, Chunshan
    He, Xiaokui
    Liu, Xiaohui
    Vardas, Panos E.
    Ma, Changsheng
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (12) : 1263 - 1270
  • [37] Insight into contact force local impedance technology for predicting effective pulmonary vein isolation
    Lepillier, Antoine
    Maggio, Ruggero
    De Sanctis, Valerio
    Malacrida, Maurizio
    Stabile, Giuseppe
    Zakine, Cyril
    Champ-Rigot, Laure
    Anselmino, Matteo
    Segreti, Luca
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Garnier, Fabien
    Mascia, Giuseppe
    Pandozi, Claudio
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Scaglione, Marco
    Cosaro, Giuseppe
    Ferraro, Anna
    Paziaud, Olivier
    Maglia, Giampiero
    Solimene, Francesco
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [38] Clinical outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Impact of intraprocedural heart rhythm
    Reissmann, Bruno
    Heeger, Christian-H
    Opitz, Karena
    Schlueter, Michael
    Wohlmuth, Peter
    Rottner, Laura
    Fink, Thomas
    Gerds-Li, Jin-Hong
    Mathew, Shibu
    Lemes, Christine
    Maurer, Tilman
    Ouyang, Feifan
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Rillig, Andreas
    Schoeppenthau, Doreen
    Metzner, Andreas
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (05) : 807 - 814
  • [39] Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study
    Pedrote, Alonso
    Arana-Rueda, Eduardo
    Arce-Leon, Alvaro
    Acosta, Juan
    Gomez-Pulido, Federico
    Luis Martos-Maine, Jose
    Frutos-Lopez, Manuel
    Sanchez-Brotons, Juan
    Garcia-Riesco, Lorena
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (04): : 361 - 369
  • [40] Proper use of fentanyl facilitates anesthesia during pulmonary vein isolation
    Sachiko Takamatsu
    Motomi Tachibana
    Nobuhisa Ii
    Yusuke Hasui
    Kensuke Matsumoto
    Kimikazu Banba
    Heart and Vessels, 2022, 37 : 1034 - 1043