Does Technological Innovation Promote Green Development? A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China

被引:40
作者
Hu, Senlin [1 ]
Zeng, Gang [1 ]
Cao, Xianzhong [1 ]
Yuan, Huaxi [2 ]
Chen, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Ctr Modern Chinese City Studies, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
关键词
technological innovation; green development; ecological modernization theory; Spatial Panel Durbin Model; panel threshold model; Yangtze River Economic Belt; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL PROGRESS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; POLLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18116111
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The role of technological innovation (TI) in green development is controversial. Based on 2003-2017 panel data of 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), this study constructed an index system to evaluate urban green development and analyzed the role of TI on urban green development with the help of a panel econometric model. The results show that: (1) From 2003 to 2017, the levels of TI and green development of cities in the YREB have gradually improved, but the core-periphery structure is obvious, and the levels of TI and green development in the lower reaches are significantly higher than those in the middle and upper reaches. (2) TI has a significant positive role in promoting green development, showing a U-shaped nonlinear relationship, and this relationship varies from region to region. (3) TI has a significant impact on green development with direct and indirect effects. In the economic and social dimensions, TI has a positive impact on green development, while in the ecological dimension, the direct effect and indirect effect have opposite relationships. (4) TI has a significant threshold effect on green development, and there are differences in threshold characteristics between the three dimensions. These findings provide a scientific basis for policymaking about innovation-driven regional green development, and it can enrich the related theories of environmental economic geography.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SUST AS GREEN TRANS
[2]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[3]   The Effect of Innovation-Driven Strategy on Green Economic Development in China-An Empirical Study of Smart Cities [J].
Cao, Wenbin ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Qian, Peng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (09)
[4]  
Constantinescu A., 2014, J KNOWL MANAG EC INF, V4, P13
[5]   Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management? [J].
Costa, Joana .
RESOURCES-BASEL, 2021, 10 (02) :1-21
[6]   The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability [J].
Dempsey, Nicola ;
Bramley, Glen ;
Power, Sinead ;
Brown, Caroline .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 19 (05) :289-300
[7]   Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? [J].
Dhahri, Sabrine ;
Omri, Anis .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 106 :64-77
[8]  
Dietz T., 1994, HUM ECOL REV, V1, P277, DOI DOI 10.2307/24706840
[9]   Is there a ripple effect in environmental regulation in China? - Evidence from the local-neighborhood green technology innovation perspective [J].
Dong, Zhiqing ;
He, Yongda ;
Wang, Hui ;
Wang, Linhui .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 118
[10]   IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH [J].
EHRLICH, PR ;
HOLDREN, JP .
SCIENCE, 1971, 171 (3977) :1212-&