Life-cycle assessment and production policy: An application to corrugated paperboard manufacture

被引:3
作者
Lee, YM
Ding, CY
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Nat Resource Management, Taipei 10433, Taiwan
[2] Ind Technol Res Inst 321, Union Chem Labs, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
关键词
life-cycle assessment; analytical hierarchy process; multiobjective programming; corrugated paperboard;
D O I
10.1006/jema.2000.0337
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the study is to develop a framework of applying life cycle assessment to production policy. A case-study on corrugated paperboard manufacture is therefore implemented. The application framework comprises three components: the conventional life cycle assessment procedure, the analytical hierarchy process, and a multiobjective programming model. In the decision model for production policy adjustment the objectives of cost-effectiveness and environment-friendliness are incorporated The environmental impacts are classified as categories of pollution and disturbance as well as space groups of global, regional and local scales. This makes applicable the analytical hierarchy process for evaluating the environmental impacts. In the application the objectives incorporated are found to be competitive. The manufacture has to trade the increase of production costs for the reduction of environmental impacts. We also observe that the marginal effects of impacts on cost increase as the spatial scales of impact increase. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, 14040 ISO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, TECHN FRAM LIF CYCL
  • [3] COHEN JL, 1978, MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGR, P69
  • [4] Curran M.A., 1996, ENV LIFE CYCLE ASSES
  • [5] DING CY, 1997, THESIS NATL CHUNG HS
  • [6] *EXP CHOIC INC, 1992, US MAN EXP CHOIC
  • [7] Guinee J.B., 1993, J CLEAN PROD, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.1016/0959-6526(93)90046-E
  • [8] HAIMES Y, 1973, CONTROL DYNAMIC SYST, V9, P435
  • [9] *LINDO SYST, 1991, US MAN LINDO LIN INT
  • [10] Saaty TL., 1980, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, DOI DOI 10.3414/ME10-01-0028