Framework for assessing the performance of flood adaptation innovations using a risk-based approach

被引:8
作者
Lendering, Kasper T. [1 ,2 ]
Sebastian, Antonia [1 ,3 ]
Jonkman, Sebastiaan N. [1 ]
Kok, Matthijs [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Hydraul Engn, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Horvat & Partners, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
climate change; flood mitigation; integrated flood risk management; risk analysis; SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.12485
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The application of risk-based approaches for the design of flood infrastructure has become increasingly common in flood management. This approach, based on risk reduction and reliability, is used to assess the performance of conventional interventions (e.g., flood defences and dams) and to support decisions regarding their implementation. However, for more innovative solutions, performance has often not been quantified by means of these metrics and, therefore, end-users are hesitant to implement them in existing flood risk reduction systems. To overcome the gap between innovators and end-users, we present a framework based on four performance indicators, to ensure the required insights in risk and reliability are provided. The four indicators: effectiveness, durability, reliability and costs, allow end-users to evaluate, select, and implement flood adaptation innovations, and provide innovators with insight into the performance of the technology and the criteria and information necessary for successful market uptake of their innovation. The practical application of the framework is demonstrated for a (hypothetical) case of a hospital complex built in an area that has subsided below the surrounding area, which is subject to tropical rain showers. The following innovations are considered: an early flood warning system, a green roof, and a temporary flood barrier.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012 - An indicator-based report, DOI DOI 10.2800/66071
[2]  
Bea R., 2010, HUMAN ORG FACTORS RI
[3]   Human and organization factors: engineering operating safety into offshore structures [J].
Bea, RG .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1998, 61 (1-2) :109-126
[4]  
Boon M. J. J., 2007, WATER CONTROLLING WA
[5]   Comments on "Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change?" Reply [J].
Bouwer, Laurens M. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 92 (06) :792-793
[6]  
Bubeck P., 2013, Comprehensive Flood Risk Management, P1199, DOI DOI 10.1111/JFR3.12151
[7]  
Cardona OD, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P65
[8]  
Ciria, 2014, INT LEV HDB
[9]   DILEMMA OF FLOOD CONTROL IN UNITED-STATES [J].
COSTA, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1978, 2 (04) :313-322
[10]   Method to Account for Human Intervention in Calculating the Probability of Failure [J].
de Corn, Henri ;
Inkabi, Kofi S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (03) :259-268