A Comparison of the Thermo-Fluid Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Melt Pools Formed by Laser and Electron-Beam Powder-Bed Fusion Processes

被引:20
作者
Rahman, M. Shafiqur [1 ]
Schilling, Paul J. [1 ]
Herrington, Paul D. [1 ]
Chakravarty, Uttam K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Dept Mech Engn, 2000 Lakeshore Dr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2021年 / 143卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
powder-bed fusion; laser; electron beam; CFD; melt pool; cooling rate; materials processing; mechanical behavior; metals; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; RESIDUAL-STRESS; HEAT-TRANSFER; FLUID-FLOW; CONDUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1115/1.4048371
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Powder-bed fusion (PBF) process is a subdivision of additive manufacturing (AM) technology where a heat source at a controlled speed selectively fuses regions of a powder-bed material to form three-dimensional (3D) parts in a layer-by-layer fashion. Two of the most commercialized and powerful PBF methods for fabricating full-density metallic parts are the laser PBF (L-PBF) and electron beam PBF (E-PBF) processes. In this study, a multiphysics-based 3D numerical model is developed to compare the thermo-fluid properties of Ti-6Al-4V melt pools formed by the L-PBF and E-PBF processes. The temperature-dependent properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy and the parameters for the laser and electron beams are incorporated in the model as the user-defined functions (UDFs). The melt-pool geometry and its thermo-fluid behavior are investigated using the finite volume (FV) method, and results for the variations of temperature, thermo-physical properties, velocity, geometry of the melt pool, and cooling rate in the two processes are compared under similar irradiation conditions. For an irradiance level of 26 J/mm(3) and a beam interaction time of 1.212 ms, simulation results show that the L-PBF process gives a faster cooling rate (1. 5 K/mu s) than that in the E-PBF process (0.74 K/mu s). The magnitude of liquid velocity in the melt pool is also higher in L-PBF than that in E-PBF. The numerical model is validated by comparing the simulation results for the melt-pool geometry with the PBF experimental results and comparing the numerical melt-front position with the analytical solution for the classical Stephan problem of melting of a phase-change material (PCM).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Finite element simulation of laser additive melting and solidification of Inconel 718 with experimentally tested thermal properties [J].
Andreotta, Richard ;
Ladani, Leila ;
Brindley, William .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2017, 135 :36-43
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS SO METHODIST
[3]  
Arce A.N., 2012, THERMAL MODELING SIM
[4]   Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review [J].
Bikas, H. ;
Stavropoulos, P. ;
Chryssolouris, G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 83 (1-4) :389-405
[5]  
Brown MS., 2010, Laser Precision Microfabrication, V135, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-10523-4
[6]   Energy absorption during pulsed electron beam spot melting of 304 stainless steel: Monte-Carlo simulations and in-situ temperature measurements [J].
Carriere, P. R. ;
Yue, Stephen .
VACUUM, 2017, 142 :114-122
[7]   Comparative study of fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V specimens built by electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) [J].
Chastand, Victor ;
Quaegebeur, Philippe ;
Maia, Wilson ;
Charkaluk, Eric .
MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION, 2018, 143 :76-81
[8]   On Process Temperature in Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing: Model Development and Validation [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Price, Steven ;
Lydon, James ;
Cooper, Kenneth ;
Chou, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (06)
[9]   Numerical simulation of molten pool dynamics in high power disk laser welding [J].
Cho, Won-Ik ;
Na, Suck-Joo ;
Thomy, Claus ;
Vollertsen, Frank .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 212 (01) :262-275
[10]   Simulation of melt pool behaviour during additive manufacturing: Underlying physics and progress [J].
Cook, Peter S. ;
Murphy, Anthony B. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31