Particle adhesion and removal mechanisms during brush scrubber cleaning

被引:40
|
作者
Xu, K
Vos, R
Vereecke, G
Doumen, G
Fyen, W
Mertens, PW
Heyns, MM
Vinckier, C
Fransaer, J
机构
[1] IMEC, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chem, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Met & Mat Engn Dept, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.1815319
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Brush scrubbers are among the most commonly used instruments for wafer-cleaning applications nowadays. However, the removal mechanisms of nanosized particles are far from clear, especially because no direct experimental data are available to backup theoretical models in the literature. This study combines a theoretical approach based on a force analysis with an experimental study of the removal of nanosized slurry particles. In the theoretical part, all forces affecting the adhesion and the removal of particles are evaluated to determine which are dominant in two extreme removal mechanisms: lifting and rolling. In the experimental part, the removal efficiency of 34 nm SiO2 particles is investigated by using the haze approach. Based on a study of the aging of contaminated wafers, conditions are selected where no chemical bonds are formed between a particle and a substrate. Force analysis and experimental observations both show that nanosized particles cannot be lifted directly by a brush. Instead, rolling should be the main particle-removal mechanism. The average fluid film thickness between brush and wafer surface is determined based on power measurements of the brush motor and a friction analysis, indicating that the system is in a hydrodynamic lubrication regime across a wafer in average. In this frame, results also show that the hydrodynamic drag force is the dominant removal force for nanosized particles. (C) 2004 American Vacuum Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2844 / 2852
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Particle motion and stain removal during simulated abrasive tooth cleaning
    Lewis, R.
    Barber, S. C.
    Dwyer-Joyce, R. S.
    WEAR, 2007, 263 : 188 - 197
  • [32] Effects of humidity on dust particle removal during solar panel cleaning
    Chen, E. Y.
    Renner, P.
    Lee, K.
    Guo, B.
    Liang, H.
    SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [33] A self-cleaning biological filter: How appendicularians mechanically control particle adhesion and removal
    Conley, Keats R.
    Gemmell, Brad J.
    Bouquet, Jean-Marie
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Sutherland, Kelly R.
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2018, 63 (02) : 927 - 938
  • [34] Modeling of particle removal using non-contact brush scrubbing in post-CMP cleaning processes
    Chein, Reiyu
    Liao, Wenyuan
    Journal of Adhesion, 2006, 82 (06): : 555 - 575
  • [35] Mechanisms of particle removal from silicon wafer surface in wet chemical cleaning process
    Qin, KD
    Li, YC
    JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2003, 261 (02) : 569 - 574
  • [36] Modeling of particle removal using non-contact brush scrubbing in post-CMP cleaning processes
    Chein, Reiyu
    Liao, Wenyuan
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2006, 82 (06): : 555 - 575
  • [37] Particle adhesion and removal: A review
    Visser, J
    PARTICULATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (3-4) : 169 - 196
  • [38] Particle adhesion and removal in electrophotography
    Rimai, D.S. (donald_rimai@nexpress.com), 1600, VSP BV (17):
  • [39] Particle adhesion and removal in electrophotography
    Rimai, DS
    Weiss, DS
    Quesnel, DJ
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 17 (07) : 917 - 942
  • [40] Particle adhesion and removal in electrophotography
    Rimai, D.S., 1600, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (17):