Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology

被引:44
|
作者
Fumagalli, Debora [1 ]
Blanchet-Cohen, Alexis [2 ]
Brown, David [1 ]
Desmedt, Christine [1 ]
Gacquer, David [3 ]
Michiels, Stefan [4 ,5 ]
Rothe, Francoise [1 ]
Majjaj, Samira [1 ]
Salgado, Roberto [6 ]
Larsimont, Denis [7 ]
Ignatiadis, Michail [1 ]
Maetens, Marion [1 ]
Piccart, Martine [6 ]
Detours, Vincent [3 ]
Sotiriou, Christos
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Inst Jules Bordet, Breast Canc Translat Res Lab BCTL, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Inst Rech Clin Montreal, Bioinformat Core Fac, Montreal, PQ H2W 1R7, Canada
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, IRIBHM, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Villejuif, France
[5] Univ Paris Sud, Paris, France
[6] Breast Int Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Inst Jules Bordet, Dept Pathol, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[8] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Gene expression signatures; Affymetrix; Microarray; Illumina; RNA-Seq; Immunohistochemistry; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; HER2; receptor; AMERICAN SOCIETY; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; SEQ; PROGNOSIS; PROFILES; ESTROGEN; RECOMMENDATIONS; CELLS; ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-15-1008
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Microarrays have revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research by enabling studies of gene expression on a transcriptome wide scale. Recently, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) has emerged as an alternative for precise readouts of the transcriptome. To date, no study has compared the ability of the two technologies to quantify clinically relevant individual genes and microarray-derived gene expression signatures (GES) in a set of BC samples encompassing the known molecular BC's subtypes. To accomplish this, the RNA from 57 BCs representing the four main molecular subtypes (triple negative, HER2 positive, luminal A, luminal B), was profiled with Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 chips and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The correlations of three clinically relevant BC genes, six molecular subtype classifiers, and a selection of 21 GES were evaluated. Results: 16,097 genes common to the two platforms were retained for downstream analysis. Gene-wise comparison of microarray and RNA-Seq data revealed that 52% had a Spearman's correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 with highly correlated genes displaying significantly higher expression levels. We found excellent correlation between microarray and RNA-Seq for the estrogen receptor (ER; r(s) = 0.973; 95% CI: 0.971-0.975), progesterone receptor (PgR; r(s) = 0.95; 0.947-0.954), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; r(s) = 0.918; 0.912-0.923), while a few discordances between ER and PgR quantified by immunohistochemistry and RNA-Seq/microarray were observed. All the subtype classifiers evaluated agreed well (Cohen's kappa coefficients >0.8) and all the proliferation-based GES showed excellent Spearman correlations between microarray and RNA-Seq (all r(s) >0.965). Immune-, stroma- and pathway-based GES showed a lower correlation relative to prognostic signatures (all r(s) >0.6). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a systematic comparison of RNA-Seq to microarray for the evaluation of single genes and GES clinically relevant to BC. According to our results, the vast majority of single gene biomarkers and well-established GES can be reliably evaluated using the RNA-Seq technology.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Novel 2 Gene Signatures Associated With Breast Cancer Proliferation: Insights From Predictive Differential Gene Expression Analysis
    Ibrahim, Asmaa
    Toss, Michael S.
    Alsaleem, Mansour
    Makhlouf, Shorouk
    Atallah, Nehal
    Green, Andrew R.
    Rakha, Emad A.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2024, 37 (02)
  • [32] Novel tumor sampling strategies to enable microarray gene expression signatures in breast cancer: a study to determine feasibility and reproducibility in the context of clinical care
    Christopher L. Tebbit
    Jun Zhai
    Brian R. Untch
    Matthew J. Ellis
    Holly K. Dressman
    Rex C. Bentley
    Jay A. Baker
    Paul K. Marcom
    Joseph R. Nevins
    Jeffrey R. Marks
    John A. Olson
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 118 : 635 - 643
  • [33] Identification of candidate RNA signatures in triple-negative breast cancer by the construction of a competing endogenous RNA network with integrative analyses of Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas data
    Yan, Ping
    Tang, Lingfeng
    Liu, Li
    Tu, Gang
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 19 (03) : 1915 - 1927
  • [34] RNA sequencing reveals the differential expression profiles of RNA in metastatic triple negative breast cancer and identifies SHISA3 as an efficient tumor suppressor gene
    Khaled, Noura
    Sonnier, Nicolas
    Molnar, Ioana
    Ponelle-Chachuat, Flora
    Kossai, Myriam
    Radosevic-Robin, Nina
    Privat, Maud
    Bidet, Yannick
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (09): : 4568 - 4581
  • [35] Gene expression profiling using targeted RNA-sequencing to elucidate the progression from histologically normal lung tissues to non-invasive lesions in invasive lung adenocarcinoma
    Kadonaga, Taichi
    Sakabe, Tomohiko
    Kidokoro, Yoshiteru
    Haruki, Tomohiro
    Nosaka, Kanae
    Nakamura, Hiroshige
    Umekita, Yoshihisa
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2022, 480 (04) : 831 - 841
  • [36] Tamoxifen-predictive value of gene expression signatures in premenopausal breast cancer: data from the randomized SBII:2 trial
    Christine Lundgren
    Julia Tutzauer
    Sarah E. Church
    Olle Stål
    Maria Ekholm
    Carina Forsare
    Bo Nordenskjöld
    Mårten Fernö
    Pär-Ola Bendahl
    Lisa Rydén
    Breast Cancer Research, 25
  • [37] Next generation sequencing-based expression profiling identifies signatures from benign stromal proliferations that define stromal components of breast cancer
    Xiangqian Guo
    Shirley X Zhu
    Alayne L Brunner
    Matt van de Rijn
    Robert B West
    Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [38] Total RNA yield and microarray gene expression profiles from fine-needle aspiration biopsy and core needle biopsy samples of breast carcinoma
    Symmans, WF
    Ayers, M
    Clark, EA
    Stec, J
    Hess, KR
    Sneige, N
    Buchholz, TA
    Krishnamurthy, S
    Ibrahim, NK
    Buzdar, AU
    Theriault, RL
    Rosales, MFM
    Thomas, ES
    Gwyn, KM
    Green, MC
    Syed, AR
    Hortobagyi, GN
    Pusztai, L
    CANCER, 2003, 97 (12) : 2960 - 2971
  • [39] Post-modified non-negative matrix factorization for deconvoluting the gene expression profiles of specific cell types from heterogeneous clinical samples based on RNA-sequencing data
    Liu, Yuan
    Liang, Yu
    Kuang, Qifan
    Xie, Fanfan
    Hao, Yingyi
    Wen, Zhining
    Li, Menglong
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 2018, 32 (11)
  • [40] hist2RNA: An Efficient Deep Learning Architecture to Predict Gene Expression from Breast Cancer Histopathology Images
    Mondol, Raktim Kumar
    Millar, Ewan K. A.
    Graham, Peter H.
    Browne, Lois
    Sowmya, Arcot
    Meijering, Erik
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)