For a legal and amoral theory of secession

被引：0

作者：

Margiotta, Costanza ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Sci Polit Giurid & Studi Int, Via 8 Febbraio 1848,2, I-35122 Padua, Italy

来源：

FILOSOFIA POLITICA | 2019年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

secession; moral theories of secession; law; liminal legality; DEFENSE;

D O I：

10.1416/94987

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

Political philosophers, addressing the question of how to justify the secessionist phenomenon in the international order, reduced secession to a "moral question", considering necessary to first accept the morality of secession in order to face its legal profile. In this essay, the author believes that it is not necessary to accept the morality of secession in order to adress legally and politically the phenomenon of separatism. Therefore, to support the amorality of secession is necessary to face the question and to propose a legal theory of secession.

引用

页码：411 / 428

页数：18

共 42 条

[1]

ANDERSON B., 1996, Le comunita immaginate

[2]

[Anonymous], 1976, Il Principio Maggioritario

[3]

[Anonymous], NATIONALITY

[4]

[Anonymous], 1992, International Legal Materials, V31

[5]

BASSANI LM, 2014, JC CALHOUN NULLIFICA

[6]

BASSANI LM, 2015, EUNOMIA RIV SEMESTRA, P291

[7]

BASSANI LM, 2016, REPUBBLICA DEMOCRAZI

[8]

BAUBOCK R, 1997, WHY STAY TOGETHER PL, P19

[9] A Multilevel Theory of Democratic Secession [J].

Baubock, Rainer .

ETHNOPOLITICS, 2019, 18 (03) :227-246

[10]

BRUBAKER Rogers., 1998, NATL SELF DETERMINAT, P233

← 1 2 3 4 5 →