Plain radiographic evaluation of the nasopharynx: Do raters agree?

Background: Subjective plain radiographic evaluation of the nasopharynx has been a widely adopted technique. Although it has its own limitations, its ease of interpretation and simplicity are some of its advantages. Aim: To investigate the reliability, using kappa, in subjectively reporting plain nasopharyngeal radiographs in children with symptoms suggestive of enlarged adenoids. Methods: This was a retrospective study of the clinical records, and plain X-rays of the nasopharynx of paediatric patients with clinical features of adenoid hypertrophy in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Institution from January 2008 to December 2008. Results: Fifty-one children with a mean age of 3.4 years; standard deviation of 2.772 was studied. They had an age range of 2 months to 12 years. Most (66.6%) of the children studied were in the age bracket 04 years. The inter-rater reliability between the two Otolaryngologists, and that between an Otolaryngologist and a Radiologist using kappa statistics were 0.6696, 95% CI (0.5035-0.8357; p < 0.05) and 0.8182, 95% CI (0.7073-0.9291; p < 0.05) respectively. While the kappa intra-rater reliabilities for the two Otolaryngologists were 0.6931, 95% CI (0.5473-0.8389) and 0.9591, 95% CI (0.9033-1.000). Conclusion: There was a high level of agreement among trained raters, in subjectively interpreting plain nasophatyngeal radiographs in children with suspected adenoidal obstruction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.