Load Balancing Under Strict Compatibility Constraints

被引:0
|
作者
Rutten, Daan [1 ]
Mukherjeea, Debankur [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
mean-field limit; power of d; stochastic coupling; load balancing on network; data locality; many-server asymptotics; queueing theory; SCALE HETEROGENEOUS SYSTEMS; THROUGHPUT; STABILITY; CHOICE; QUEUE;
D O I
10.1287/moor.2022.1258
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Consider a system with N identical single-server queues and a number of task types, where each server is able to process only a small subset of possible task types. Arriving tasks select d >= 2 random compatible servers and join the shortest queue among them. The compatibility constraints are captured by a fixed bipartite graph between the servers and the task types. When the graph is complete bipartite, the mean-field approximation is accurate. However, such dense compatibility graphs are infeasible for large-scale implementation. We characterize a class of sparse compatibility graphs for which the mean-field approximation remains valid. For this, we introduce a novel notion, called proportional sparsity, and establish that systems with proportionally sparse compatibility graphs asymptotically match the performance of a fully flexible system. Furthermore, we show that proportionally sparse random compatibility graphs can be constructed, which reduce the server degree almost by a factor N/ln (N) compared with the complete bipartite compatibility graph.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 256
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MEAN-FIELD ANALYSIS FOR LOAD BALANCING ON SPATIAL GRAPHS
    Rutiten, Daan
    Mukherjee, Debankur
    ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2024, 34 (06): : 5228 - 5257
  • [2] Mean-field Analysis for Load Balancing on Spatial Graphs
    Rutten D.
    Mukherjee D.
    Performance Evaluation Review, 2023, 51 (01): : 27 - 28
  • [3] Optimal Load Balancing with Locality Constraints
    Weng, Wentao
    Zhou, Xingyu
    Srikant, R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2020, 4 (03)
  • [4] Prioritized organ allocation rules under compatibility constraints
    Li, Mengling
    Riyanto, Yohanes E.
    Xu, Menghan
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2023, 141 : 403 - 427
  • [5] Asymptotic independence of queues under randomized load balancing
    Bramson, Maury
    Lu, Yi
    Prabhakar, Balaji
    QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2012, 71 (03) : 247 - 292
  • [6] The impact of load comparison errors on the power-of-d load balancing
    Bhambay, Sanidhay
    Mukhopadhyay, Arpan
    Vasantam, Thirupathaiah
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2024, 164
  • [7] UNIVERSALITY OF LOAD BALANCING SCHEMES ON THE DIFFUSION SCALE
    Mukherjee, Debankur
    Borst, Sem C.
    Van Leeuwaarden, Johan S. H.
    Whiting, Philip A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2016, 53 (04) : 1111 - 1124
  • [8] CLRPL: Context-Aware and Load Balancing RPL for lot Networks Under Heavy and Highly Dynamic Load
    Taghizadeh, Seyedreza
    Bobarshad, Hossein
    Elbiaze, Halima
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 23277 - 23291
  • [9] Value driven load balancing
    Doroudi, Sherwin
    Hyytia, Esa
    Harchol-Balter, Mor
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2014, 79 : 306 - 327
  • [10] Stability of load balancing control
    Gouaisbaut, Frederic
    Queinnec, Isabelle
    Tarbouriech, Sophie
    APPLICATIONS OF TIME DELAY SYSTEMS, 2007, 352 : 77 - 95