Entropy-Based Risk Control of Geological Disasters in Mountain Tunnels under Uncertain Environments

被引:8
作者
Xia, Yuanpu [1 ]
Xiong, Ziming [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Zhu [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Hao [1 ]
Dong, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Engn Univ PLA, State Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Mitigat Explos &, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
uncertainty; risk control; decision-making; tunnel engineering; entropy; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; EXPECTED UTILITY; KARST TUNNELS; MODEL; INRUSH; WATER;
D O I
10.3390/e20070503
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Uncertainty is one of the main sources of risk of geological hazards in tunnel engineering. Uncertainty information not only affects the accuracy of evaluation results, but also affects the reliability of decision-making schemes. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate and control the impact of uncertainty on risk. In this study, the problems in the existing entropy-hazard model such as inefficient decision-making and failure of decision-making are analysed, and an improved uncertainty evaluation and control process are proposed. Then the tolerance cost, the key factor in the decision-making model, is also discussed. It is considered that the amount of change in risk value (<) can better reflect the psychological behaviour of decision-makers. Thirdly, common multi-attribute decision-making models, such as the expected utility-entropy model, are analysed, and then the viewpoint of different types of decision-making issues that require different decision methods is proposed. The well-known Allais paradox is explained by the proposed methods. Finally, the engineering application results show that the uncertainty control idea proposed here is accurate and effective. This research indicates a direction for further research into uncertainty, and risk control, issues affecting underground engineering works.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SENSITIVITY ANAL
  • [2] Managing Information Uncertainty and Complexity in Decision-Making
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    Tavana, Madjid
    Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
    Bausys, Romualdas
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2017,
  • [3] Solving Civil Engineering Problems by Means of Fuzzy and Stochastic MCDM Methods: Current State and Future Research
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    Kala, Zdenek
    Marzouk, Mohamed
    Vaidogas, Egidijus Rytas
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [4] Auder B., 2008, SAFETY RELIABILITY R
  • [5] Practical implications of the new risk perspectives
    Aven, Terje
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 115 : 136 - 145
  • [6] Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making
    Aven, Terje
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [7] On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain
    Aven, Terje
    Renn, Ortwin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] Decision analysis under ambiguity
    Borgonovo, Emanuele
    Marinacci, Massimo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 244 (03) : 823 - 836
  • [9] Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on two-class fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
    Chu, Handong
    Xu, Guangli
    Yasufuku, Noriyuki
    Yu, Zhang
    Liu, Pola
    Wang, Jifeng
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (07)
  • [10] Decision-Making Model under Risk Assessment Based on Entropy
    Dong, Xin
    Lu, Hao
    Xia, Yuanpu
    Xiong, Ziming
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2016, 18 (11)