ASCPRO Recommendations for the Assessment of Fatigue as an Outcome in Clinical Trials

被引:102
作者
Barsevick, Andrea M. [1 ]
Cleeland, Charles S. [2 ]
Manning, Donald C. [3 ]
O'Mara, Ann M. [4 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [4 ]
Scott, Jane A. [6 ]
Sloan, Jeff A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Shionogi USA Inc, Florham Pk, NJ USA
[4] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Grad Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[6] MAPI Values, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
关键词
Cancer-related fatigue; self-report measures; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; CANCER-RELATED FATIGUE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY; PROPOSED DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; VALIDITY; DISEASE; SCALE; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.02.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Development of pharmacological and behavioral interventions for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) requires adequate measures of this symptom. A guidance document from the Food and Drug Administration offers criteria for the formulation and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials to support drug or device labeling claims. Methods. An independent working group, ASCPRO (Assessing Symptoms of Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes), has begun developing recommendations for the measurement of symptoms in oncology clinical trials. The recommendations of the Fatigue Task Force for measurement of CRF are presented here. Results. There was consensus that CRF could be measured effectively in clinical trials as the sensation of fatigue or tiredness, impact of fatigue/tiredness on usual functioning, or as both sensation and impact. The ASCPRO Fatigue Task Force constructed a definition and conceptual model to guide the measurement of CRF. ASCPRO recommendations do not endorse a specific fatigue measure but clarify how to evaluate and implement fatigue assessments in clinical studies. The selection of a CRF measure should be tailored to the goals of the research. Measurement issues related to various research environments were also discussed. Conclusions. There exist in the literature good measures of CRF for clinical trials, with strong evidence of clarity and comprehensibility to patients, content and construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change in conditions in which one would expect them to change (assay sensitivity), and sufficient evidence to establish guides for interpreting changes in scores. Direction for future research is discussed. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:1086-1099. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1086 / 1099
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
  • [2] Ahlberg Karin, 2004, Biol Res Nurs, V5, P203, DOI 10.1177/1099800403259500
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
  • [4] Armes J., 2004, Fatigue in cancer, P137
  • [5] Barsevick A M, 2001, Oncol Nurs Forum, V28, P1363
  • [6] BELZA BL, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P639
  • [7] The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods
    Broderick, Joan E.
    Schwartz, Joseph E.
    Vikingstad, Gregory
    Pribbernow, Michelle
    Grossman, Steven
    Stone, Arthur A.
    [J]. PAIN, 2008, 139 (01) : 146 - 157
  • [8] The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval
    Burke, L. B.
    Kennedy, D. L.
    Miskala, P. H.
    Papadopoulos, E. J.
    Trentacosti, A. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (02) : 281 - 283
  • [9] Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice
    Butt, Zeeshan
    Wagner, Lynne I.
    Beaumont, Jennifer L.
    Paice, Judith A.
    Peterman, Amy H.
    Shevrin, Dan
    Von Roenn, Jamie H.
    Carro, George
    Straus, Joshua L.
    Muir, J. Cameron
    Cella, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2008, 35 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [10] Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales
    Cella, D
    Eton, DT
    Lai, JS
    Peterman, AH
    Merkel, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (06) : 547 - 561