Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Part II: Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments-A Systematic Review

被引:93
作者
Huisstede, Bionka M. [1 ,2 ]
Randsdorp, Manon S. [2 ]
Coert, J. Henk [3 ]
Glerum, Suzanne [2 ]
van Middelkoop, Marienke [2 ]
Koes, Bart W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Plast Reconstruct Hand Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2010年 / 91卷 / 07期
关键词
Carpal tunnel syndrome; General surgery; Rehabilitation; Review [publication type; Treatment outcome; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; LOCAL STEROID INJECTION; LIMITED PALMAR INCISION; ENDOSCOPIC RELEASE; INTERNAL NEUROLYSIS; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; FOLLOW-UP; LIGAMENT DIVISION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.023
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, Coert JH, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1005-24. Objective: To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Data Sources: The Cochrane Library, Pub Med, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Study Selection: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the methodologic quality. Data Synthesis: A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. Two reviews and 25 RCTs were included. Moderate evidence was found in favor of surgical treatment compared with splinting or antiinflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term, and for the effectiveness of corticosteroid irrigation of the median nerve before skin closure as additive to carpal tunnel release in the short term. Limited evidence was found in favor of a double-incision technique compared with the standard incision technique. Also, limited evidence was found in favor of a mini-open technique assisted by a Knife light instrument compared with a standard open release at 19 months of followup. However, in the short term and at 30 months of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the mini-open technique assisted by a Knife light instrument compared with a standard open release. Many studies compared different surgical interventions, but no evidence was found in favor of any one of them. No RCTs explored the optimal timing strategy for surgery. No evidence was found for the efficacy of various presurgical or postsurgical treatment programs, including splinting. Conclusions: Surgical treatment seems to be more effective than splinting or anti-inflammatory drugs plus hand therapy in the midterm and long term to treat CTS. However, there is no unequivocal evidence that suggests one surgical treatment is more effective than the other. More research is needed to study conservative to surgical treatment in which also should be taken into account the optimal timing of surgery. Future research should also concentrate on optimal presurgical and postsurgical treatment programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1024
页数:20
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   ENDOSCOPIC RELEASE OF THE CARPAL-TUNNEL - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
AGEE, JM ;
MCCARROLL, HR ;
TORTOSA, RD ;
BERRY, DA ;
SZABO, RM ;
PEIMER, CA .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 17A (06) :987-995
[2]  
AGEE JM, 1994, HAND CLIN, V10, P647
[3]  
Aroori Somaiah, 2008, Ulster Med J, V77, P6
[4]   Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial [J].
Atroshi, Isam ;
Larsson, Gert-Uno ;
Ornstein, Ewald ;
Hofer, Manfred ;
Johnsson, Ragnar ;
Ranstam, Jonas .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7556) :1473-1476A
[5]   Open Compared With 2-Portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A 5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Atroshi, Isam ;
Hofer, Manfred ;
Larsson, Gert-Uno ;
Ornstein, Ewald ;
Johnsson, Ragnar ;
Ranstam, Jonas .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 34A (02) :266-272
[6]  
Benedetti V R, 1996, Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, V28, P151
[7]   A randomized controlled trial of Knifelight and open carpal tunnel release [J].
Bhattacharya, R ;
Birdsall, PD ;
Finn, P ;
Stothard, J .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2004, 29B (02) :113-115
[8]   Carpal tunnel syndrome [J].
Bland, Jeremy D. P. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7615) :343-346
[9]   CARPAL-TUNNEL RELEASE - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED ASSESSMENT OF OPEN AND ENDOSCOPIC METHODS [J].
BROWN, RA ;
GELBERMAN, RH ;
SEILER, JG ;
ABRAHAMSSON, SO ;
WEILAND, AJ ;
URBANIAK, JR ;
SCHOENFELD, DA ;
FURCOLO, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1265-1275
[10]   The operative treatment of carpel tunnel syndrome and its relevance to endoscopic release [J].
Brüser, P ;
Richter, M ;
Larkin, G ;
Lefering, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 22 (2-3) :80-84