Willingness to pay for improved public health care services in Saudi Arabia: a contingent valuation study among heads of Saudi households

被引:28
作者
Al-Hanawi, Mohammed K. [1 ,2 ]
Alsharqi, Omar [1 ]
Vaidya, Kirit [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Hlth Serv & Hosp Adm Dept, Fac Econ & Adm, Jeddah 21441, Saudi Arabia
[2] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Econ Finance & Entrepreneurship Grp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
healthcare finance; contingent valuation; public preferences; willingness to pay; health insurance; QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS; BENEFITS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1017/S1744133118000191
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The bulk of health care service provision in Saudi Arabia is undertaken by the public health care sector through the Ministry of Health, which is funded annually by the total government budget, which, in turn, is derived primarily from oil revenue. Public health care services in Saudi Arabia are characterised by an overload, overuse, and shortage of medical personnel, which can result in dissatisfaction with the quality of the current public health care services. This study uses a contingent valuation method to investigate the willingness of Saudi people to pay for improvements to the quality of public health care services. This study also determines the association between the willingness to pay for quality improvements and respondents' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. A pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 1187 heads of household in Jeddah Province over a five-month period. Multi-stage sampling was employed to recruit participants. Partial Tobit regression and corresponding marginal effects analyses were used to analyse the data. These empirical analyses show that the majority of the sample was willing to pay for quality improvements in the public health care services. The results of this study might be of use to policymakers to help with both priority setting and fund allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 93
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]  
Pearce D., 2002, EC VALUATION STATED
[42]  
Ryan M, 2001, Health Technol Assess, V5, P1
[43]   Population distribution and household conditions in Saudi Arabia: reflections from the 2010 Census [J].
Salam, Asharaf Abdul ;
Elsegaey, Ibrahim ;
Khraif, Rshood ;
Al-Mutairi, Abdullah .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3
[44]   ESTIMATION OF RELATIONSHIPS FOR LIMITED DEPENDENT-VARIABLES [J].
TOBIN, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 1958, 26 (01) :24-36
[45]   The contingent valuation method: a review [J].
Venkatachalam, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2004, 24 (01) :89-124
[46]  
Victor D., 2013, Urban Studies Research, V2, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/659425, DOI 10.1155/2013/659425, 10.1155/2013/659425]
[47]   The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world [J].
Viscusi, WK ;
Aldy, JE .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2003, 27 (01) :5-76
[48]   Covering Women's Greatest Health Fear: Breast Cancer Information in Consumer Magazines [J].
Walsh-Childers, Kim ;
Edwards, Heather ;
Grobmyer, Stephen .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 26 (03) :209-220
[49]  
Walston S, 2008, ANN SAUDI MED, V28, P243
[50]   MEASUREMENT ISSUES WITH ITERATED, CONTINUOUS-INTERVAL CONTINGENT VALUATION DATA [J].
WHITEHEAD, JC ;
HOBAN, TJ ;
CLIFFORD, WB .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 43 (02) :129-139