Thermal analysis of plasma facing by finite difference and components of SST-1 Tokamak finite element methods

被引:2
|
作者
Chaudhuri, P [1 ]
Reddy, DC [1 ]
Saxena, YC [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Plasma Res, Gandhinagar 382428, India
关键词
Tokamak; plasma facing components; thermal analysis; finite difference method; finite element method;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2004.07.001
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Thermal analysis is a prime consideration in the design of plasma facing components (PFC) cooling during plasma operation in a Tokamak device. The task is greatly simplified by using computer-based numerical techniques. Finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) are the two methods generally being used for thermal analysis. FEM is gaining wide acceptance for such problems because it performs all the necessary computations in the computer. FDM, in contrast, requires significant amounts of data to be calculated for input into the computer program. This can provide accurate thermal analysis in less time and less computer memory than FEM. An efficient finite difference (FD) code has been developed to derive the two-dimensional temperature profile in different PFC modules subjected to steady-state condition. The details of the code and comparison of its results with finite element (FE) analysis are presented in this paper. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 310
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of High vacuum facility for baking and cool down experiments for SST-1 Tokamak components
    Khan, Ziauddin
    Pathan, Firozkhan S.
    Yuvakiran, Paravastu
    George, Siju
    Manthena, Himabindu
    Raval, Dilip C.
    Thankey, Prashant L.
    Dhanani, Kalpesh R.
    Gupta, Manoj Kumar
    Pradhan, Subrata
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VACUUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION FOR ACCELERATORS (IVS 2012), 2012, 390
  • [32] Design and Analysis of liquid nitrogen cooled sorption cryopump for SST-1 Tokamak
    Gupta, Vishal
    Gangradey, Ranjana
    Mukherjee, Samiran S.
    Mishra, Jyoti Shankar
    Nayak, Pratik A.
    Panchal, Paresh
    Tanna, Vipul L.
    Paravastu, Yuvakiran
    Raval, Dilip C.
    Khan, Ziauddin
    George, Siju
    Thankey, Prashant L.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2020, 159
  • [33] Experience with helium leak and thermal shocks test of SST-1 cryo components
    Sharma, Rajiv
    Nimavat, Hiren
    Srikanth, G. L. N.
    Bairagi, Nitin
    Shah, Pankil
    Tanna, V. L.
    Pradhan, S.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VACUUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION FOR ACCELERATORS (IVS 2012), 2012, 390
  • [34] An analysis of finite volume, finite element, and finite difference methods using some concepts from algebraic topology
    Mattiussi, C
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1997, 133 (02) : 289 - 309
  • [35] A NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF THE FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
    RINKER, EA
    SPRINGMAN, RA
    LITTLE, RR
    OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1985, 85 (02) : 82 - 82
  • [36] Modelling the core convection using finite element and finite difference methods
    Chan, K. H.
    Li, Ligang
    Liao, Xinhao
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2006, 157 (1-2) : 124 - 138
  • [37] Asymptotic Behavior of the Finite Difference and the Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations
    LIU Yang~1
    2. School of Mathematics and Statistics
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2005, (06) : 12 - 15
  • [38] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINITE-ELEMENT AND FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHODS
    GRAY, WG
    PINDER, GF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1976, 10 (04) : 893 - 923
  • [39] PROPERTIES OF ORTHOGONAL AND TRIANGULAR GRIDS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MAGNETIC FIELDS BASED ON THE FINITE DIFFERENCE AND FINITE ELEMENT METHODS - 1. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
    Fuchs, E.F.
    McNaughton, G.A.
    Acta Technica CSAV (Ceskoslovensk Akademie Ved), 1982, 27 (02): : 168 - 205
  • [40] Finite element analysis of hyperelastic components
    Univ of Central Florida, Orlando, United States
    Appl Mech Rev, 5 (303-320):