An eco-friendly evaluation for locating wheat processing plants: an integrated approach based on interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and COPRAS

被引:11
作者
Cetinkaya, Cihan [1 ]
Ozkan, Baris [2 ]
Ozceylan, Eren [3 ]
Haffar, Samer [4 ]
机构
[1] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, TR-01200 Adana, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-55139 Samsun, Turkey
[3] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
[4] Gaziantep Univ, Inst Sci, TR-27300 Gaziantep, Turkey
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; COPRAS; Evaluation; Interval type-2 fuzzy sets; Wheat plant; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; HYBRID MCDM MODEL; SELECTION; SITE; MANAGEMENT; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-022-06922-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Site selection for organizations is a complex and unstructured problem that must be analyzed carefully and properly since a localization error could drive to bankruptcy. This problem has been discussed widely and effectively using multi-criteria decision-making methods in a manufacturing context, but it has been little studied in the agricultural industry. The aim of this study is to proposing a methodological approach to evaluate the fifty states in the United States (US) in terms of wheat processing plant locations. To do so, a literature review is searched to determine the ten sub-criteria under financial, environmental, and spatial dimensions. To overcome the uncertainty of experts' judgment in criteria prioritization, interval type-2 fuzzy (IT2F)-analytic hierarchy process is used. The method of complex proportional assessment of alternatives is used to obtain the final rank of states. The results and verification of the methodology are carried out throughout a sensitivity analysis of the weights. The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that when financial aspects are focused upon, California is the best alternative, followed by Texas and Oklahoma. In addition, from the environmental and spatial perspectives, Vermont and California are the best choices, respectively. The findings of this study can provide useful information to wheat plant decision-makers and serve as a reference for US policy.
引用
收藏
页码:4081 / 4102
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Addressing resiliency in supply chains through a multi-criteria group evaluation approach under interval type-2 fuzzy uncertainty [J].
Haghighi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Mousavi, Seyed Meysam ;
Mohagheghi, Vahid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (02) :91-113
[42]   A variable weight-based interval type-2 fuzzy rough comprehensive evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment [J].
Yushan Zhu ;
Xiaoling Wang ;
Wenlong Chen ;
Hui Guo ;
Dong Li .
Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 :7851-7879
[43]   A novel belief-based QFD-AHP model in interval type-2 fuzzy environment for lean after-sales service in automotive industry [J].
Baskir, Mukerrem Bahar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2023, 14 (03) :653-678
[44]   Sustainability performance evaluation of renewable energy systems using a new multi-expert multi-criteria interval type-2 fuzzy distance to ideal solution approach [J].
Hendiani, Sepehr ;
Walther, Grit .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 347
[45]   Hazard identification, risk assessment and control for dam construction safety using an integrated BWM and MARCOS approach under interval type-2 fuzzy sets environment [J].
Celik, Erkan ;
Gul, Muhammet .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 127
[46]   An outranking approach based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets to evaluate preparedness and response ability of non-governmental humanitarian relief organizations [J].
Celik, Erkan ;
Gumus, Alev Taskin .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 101 :21-34
[47]   An interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions using a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis [J].
Chen, Ting-Yu .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 85 :57-72
[48]   Incomplete interval type-2 fuzzy preference relations based on a multi-criteria group decision-making model for the evaluation of wastewater treatment technologies [J].
Yao, Liming ;
Xu, Zhongwen ;
Lv, Chengwei ;
Hashim, Muhammad .
MEASUREMENT, 2020, 151
[49]   EVALUATION BY AN AREA-BASED METHOD OF RANKING INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY SETS (EAMRIT-2F) FOR MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Amiri, Maghsoud ;
Antucheviciene, Jurgita .
TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2016, 15 (03) :76-95
[50]   Multi-criteria solar power plant siting problem solution using a GIS-Taguchi loss function based interval type-2 fuzzy approach: The case of Kars Province/Turkey [J].
Sahin, Gokhan ;
Akkus, Ibrahim ;
Koc, Ahmet ;
van Sark, Wilfried .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)